From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Support coverage testing with GCC/gcov Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:39:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 16 10:45:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZ02R-0005iU-F2 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:45:19 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752745AbZBPJnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:43:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752630AbZBPJnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:43:52 -0500 Received: from imag.imag.fr ([129.88.30.1]:53110 "EHLO imag.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752541AbZBPJnv (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:43:51 -0500 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1G9d5w9001684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:39:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from bauges.imag.fr ([129.88.43.5]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1LYzwO-0006g1-VU; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:39:04 +0100 Received: from moy by bauges.imag.fr with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LYzwO-0001ol-RT; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:39:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Rast's message of "Sun\, 15 Feb 2009 23\:25\:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:39:05 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: moy@imag.fr Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: detail: Thomas Rast writes: > With gcc's --coverage option, we can perform automatic coverage data I don't think gcc has a --coverage ... > +COVERAGE_CFLAGS = $(CFLAGS) -O0 -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs > +COVERAGE_LDFLAGS = $(CFLAGS) -O0 -lgcov ... and this is not the one you are using anyway. (but great thing to use gcov! thanks) -- Matthieu