From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: git object-count differs between clones Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:09:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2142875754.710575.1454428371555.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Martin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 02 17:09:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQdWP-0000HL-CW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:09:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755408AbcBBQJi (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:09:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.imag.fr ([129.88.30.5]:58152 "EHLO shiva.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755192AbcBBQJh (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:09:37 -0500 Received: from clopinette.imag.fr (clopinette.imag.fr [129.88.34.215]) by shiva.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u12G9UNb023281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:09:30 +0100 Received: from anie (anie.imag.fr [129.88.7.32]) by clopinette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u12G9Vvg013147; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:09:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2142875754.710575.1454428371555.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> (Andrew Martin's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:52:51 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (shiva.imag.fr [129.88.30.5]); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:09:30 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: u12G9UNb023281 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455034172.82028@XZ3XgJmpqUhExliQMWVxhA Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andrew Martin writes: > I ran "git fsck" on both, which reported no problems. Moreover, I ran "git gc" > and made sure there were no objects pending garbage collection, It's not sufficient: you may have objects reachable from your reflog, hence not candidate for garbage collection. Since the reflog is not propagated, pushing + cloning will not transfer these objects if the reflog is the only way to reach them. You may try expiring your reflog and "git gc" again. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/