From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update git-multimail to version 1.0.2 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1430133445-21488-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Michael Haggerty , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 27 21:21:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YmoaI-0000xL-Du for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:20:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965021AbbD0TUp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:20:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.imag.fr ([129.88.30.5]:50619 "EHLO shiva.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964966AbbD0TUp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:20:45 -0400 Received: from clopinette.imag.fr (clopinette.imag.fr [129.88.34.215]) by shiva.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3RJKTeq007655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:20:29 +0200 Received: from anie.imag.fr (anie.imag.fr [129.88.7.32]) by clopinette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3RJKVJM008150; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:20:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:05:54 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (shiva.imag.fr [129.88.30.5]); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:20:29 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: t3RJKTeq007655 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1430767231.75129@YjBsnTHk+IaLbZxwvoAF8Q Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Hmm, that may be technically correct but it is grossly misleading to > update the existing "was obtained on 2014-04-07" to "was obtained on > 2015-04-27", especially if nothing was actually obtained, isn't it? That is because you're looking at the patch. The intended audience are people reading the README.Git file, and the text reads just fine then. > I honestly am surprised that, after seeing the announcement about "a > new repository, co-maintainer and multiple contributors", no code > change is made over the past 12 months. That is the point indeed. Michael does not use git-multimail himself, and does not find time to work on it. I'm joining the effort, but currently have no time either. But eventually I'll go through the list of pending pull-requests, and we'll actually get new code. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/