From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
To: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: On git 1.6 (novice's opinion)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:42:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqd4bwrfa1.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D329A0.10769.2C57DE@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de> (Ulrich Windl's message of "Wed\, 01 Apr 2009 08\:45\:19 +0200")
"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> writes:
> If you compiled a Linux kernel, then do an "upgrade" to the tree, it's quite
> likely that a "make clean" after that upgrade does something different to the
> "make clean" before the upgrade. Thus I'd "make clean" before the upgrade. (which,
> I think, proves my point)
But why do a "make clean", at all?
--
Matthieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-01 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 7:21 On git 1.6 (novice's opinion) Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 8:05 ` H.Merijn Brand
2009-03-27 9:50 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 10:57 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-03-27 11:30 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-03-27 12:24 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-03-27 13:39 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 13:45 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-03-27 13:47 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-04-01 6:50 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:41 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-28 9:53 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-03-30 6:18 ` Russ Dill
2009-04-01 7:53 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 8:37 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 9:47 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 10:17 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 20:37 ` Heiko Voigt
2009-03-27 12:24 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-03-27 13:35 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 13:44 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-04-01 6:45 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:42 ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2009-03-27 12:49 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-27 13:48 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 14:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-04-01 6:59 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:29 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 7:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-04-01 9:38 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 10:10 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-02 2:17 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-03-28 10:33 ` demerphq
2009-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-01 7:35 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-29 5:41 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-03-29 9:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-04-01 7:42 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:40 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-30 9:06 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 8:15 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 8:41 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 9:55 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 10:21 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 11:52 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 12:40 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 2:32 ` Kris Shannon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vpqd4bwrfa1.fsf@bauges.imag.fr \
--to=matthieu.moy@imag.fr \
--cc=dpotapov@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.