All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
To: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] git_config callers rewritten with the new config cache API
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:51:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqegxeeuyb.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405941145-12120-1-git-send-email-tanayabh@gmail.com> (Tanay Abhra's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:12:19 -0700")

Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com> writes:

> [PATCH v3]: Most of Eric's suggestions has been implemented. See [2] for discussion.
> 	Also, new helpers introduced in v7 of the config-set API series have been used.
> 	See [1] for the documentation of the new functions.
>
> This series builds on the top of 5def4132 in pu or topic[1] in the mailing list
> with name "git config cache & special querying API utilizing the cache".

It's now called ta/config-set (see last "What's cooking in git.git").

> All patches pass every test, but there is a catch, there is slight behaviour
> change in most of them where originally the callback returns
> config_error_nonbool() when it sees a NULL value for a key causing a die
> specified in git_parse_source in config.c.
>
> The die also prints the file name and the line number as,
>
> 	"die("bad config file line %d in %s", cf->linenr, cf->name);"
>
> We lose the fine grained error checking when switching to this method.

I think a first step would be something like this:

--- a/config.c
+++ b/config.c
@@ -656,6 +656,15 @@ int git_config_string(const char **dest, const char *var, const char *value)
        return 0;
 }
 
+// TODO: either make it static or export it properly
+int git_config_string_or_die(const char **dest, const char *var, const char *value)
+{
+       if (git_config_string(dest, var, value) < 0)
+               die("bad config file (TODO: file/line info)");
+       else
+               return 0;
+}
+
 int git_config_pathname(const char **dest, const char *var, const char *value)
 {
        if (!value)
@@ -1336,7 +1345,7 @@ int git_configset_get_string(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, const char
 {
        const char *value;
        if (!git_configset_get_value(cs, key, &value))
-               return git_config_string(dest, key, value);
+               return git_config_string_or_die(dest, key, value);
        else
                return 1;
 }

In the original API, git_config_string was called at parsing time, hence
the file/line information was available through "cf". Here, we're
querying the cache which doesn't have this information yet.

I initially thought that managing properly file/line information would
be just an addition, but this example shows that it is actually needed
to be feature-complete wrt the old API. And I think we should be
feature-complete (i.e. make the code cleaner without harming the user).

So, I think it now makes sense to resurect your "file line info" patch:

  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/253123

Now that the series is properly reviewed, avoid modifying existing
patches as much as possible, and add these file/line info on top of the
existing.

I think you need to:

1) Modify the hashmap data structure and the code that fills it in to
   store the file/line info (already done in your previous WIP patch).

2) Add a by-address parameter to git_configset_get_value that allows the
   user to get the file and line information. In your previous patch,
   that would mean returning a pointer to the corresponding struct
   key_source.

3) Pass this information to git_config_string_or_die, and die with the
   right message (with a helper like die_config(struct key_source *ks)
   that takes care of the formatting)

4) apply the same to git_config_get_<other than string>.

I'd actually add a step 0) before that: add a test that checks your
behavior change. The test should pass without your patches, and fail
with your current patch. Then, it should pass again once you completed
the work.

On a side note, re-reading your previous patch, I found this which
sounds suspicious:

+	struct config_hash_entry *e;
+	struct string_list_item *si;
+	struct key_source *ks = xmalloc(sizeof(*e));

Didn't you mean xmalloc(sizeof(*ks))?
                                ^^

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-21 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-21 11:12 [PATCH v3 0/6] git_config callers rewritten with the new config cache API Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] alias.c: replace `git_config()` with `git_config_get_string()` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 12:52   ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-21 13:43   ` Ramsay Jones
2014-07-31 17:13     ` Samuel Bronson
2014-07-21 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] branch.c: " Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 17:59   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-21 18:06     ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-21 18:11     ` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] imap-send.c: replace `git_config()` with `git_config_get_*()` family Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 18:00   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-21 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] notes.c: replace `git_config()` with `git_config_get_value()` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] pager.c: " Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] notes-util.c: " Tanay Abhra
2014-07-22 11:23   ` Jeff King
2014-07-21 11:44 ` [PATCH/RFC] rewrite `git_default_config()` using config-set API functions Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 13:43   ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-21 14:23     ` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 15:37       ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-21 18:07         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-22  7:55           ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-21 13:59   ` Ramsay Jones
2014-07-21 12:51 ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2014-07-21 13:15   ` [PATCH v3 0/6] git_config callers rewritten with the new config cache API Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 13:45     ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-21 14:00       ` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-21 14:27         ` Matthieu Moy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpqegxeeuyb.fsf@anie.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tanayabh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.