From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
To: Omar Othman <omar.othman@booking.com>
Cc: Brandon McCaig <bamccaig@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: `git stash pop` UX Problem
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:15:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqlhwz5o58.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530C953F.9050805@booking.com> (Omar Othman's message of "Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:06:07 +0100")
Omar Othman <omar.othman@booking.com> writes:
> Brandon:
Please, don't top-post on this list. Look how other people answer to
each other and follow the use.
> Please note that what I am asking for is not always dropping the
> stash, but doing that *only* when the merge conflict is resolved. This
> is simply getting the whole command to be consistent. If you do `git
> stash pop` and it succeeds, the stash reference is dropped. If you do
> git stash pop` and it succeeds *after resolving the merge conflict*,
> the stash reference is *not* dropped. This is *not* consistent and
> *is* a user experience problem. I'm not asking about dumbing git down
> by any means.
Can you describe precisely what you would expect, e.g. what Git's output
should look like after such and such command?
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-25 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 8:32 `git stash pop` UX Problem Omar Othman
2014-02-24 16:04 ` Brandon McCaig
2014-02-24 16:21 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-25 12:14 ` Holger Hellmuth
2014-02-25 12:33 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-25 13:02 ` Omar Othman
2014-02-25 19:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-25 20:48 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-25 22:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-27 13:18 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-26 7:37 ` Omar Othman
2014-02-26 15:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-02-25 23:50 ` brian m. carlson
2014-02-26 7:34 ` Omar Othman
2014-02-26 0:39 ` Simon Ruderich
2014-02-27 13:22 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-25 13:06 ` Omar Othman
2014-02-25 13:15 ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2014-02-25 14:12 ` Omar Othman
2014-02-25 15:25 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-25 20:52 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-25 22:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-26 10:24 ` Stefan Haller
2014-02-26 10:45 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-28 2:57 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 4:50 ` Brandon McCaig
2014-02-28 15:12 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 15:42 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-28 17:27 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 19:45 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-03-01 8:41 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 16:02 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-28 17:45 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 19:39 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-28 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-01 8:47 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-26 7:28 ` Omar Othman
2014-02-26 8:27 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-26 19:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-26 19:46 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-26 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-26 20:33 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-26 22:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-27 0:19 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-28 3:00 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-27 13:25 ` Stephen Leake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-24 8:33 Omar Othman
2014-02-27 11:23 Damien Robert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vpqlhwz5o58.fsf@anie.imag.fr \
--to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=bamccaig@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omar.othman@booking.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.