From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: git push default behaviour? Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:25:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k42vs8pi.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> <1331202483.21444.11.camel@beez.lab.cmartin.tk> <1331203321.21444.13.camel@beez.lab.cmartin.tk> <4F58C977.8000400@xiplink.com> <20120309033826.GA6164@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vsjhi9wku.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jeff King , Dmitry Potapov , Marc Branchaud , Carlos =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn?= Nieto , Jeremy Morton , Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 09 09:26:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5vA6-0003rU-Re for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:26:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753514Ab2CII0u (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 03:26:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.imag.fr ([129.88.30.5]:60122 "EHLO shiva.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753196Ab2CII0t (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 03:26:49 -0500 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by shiva.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q298LnbE022974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:21:49 +0100 Received: from bauges.imag.fr ([129.88.7.32]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5v9E-0000DI-DF; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:26:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7vsjhi9wku.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:23:29 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (shiva.imag.fr [129.88.30.5]); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:21:50 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: q298LnbE022974 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1331886114.21396@zr7yUuMX+yhkqa2bG42EBw Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I just dug it up; start from here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/123350/focus=123541 That's an old discussion. A more recent one is here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/166743 (interleaved with a discussion about tag namespace, but the end of the message is about push.default) In this discussion, you (Junio) proposed a patch and argued exactly in the direction I do right now. I think the discussion stopped here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/166743 (i.e. "Care to roll an appliable patch?", which I guess everyone has been too lazy to do) Patch follows. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/