From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/31] Follow perlcritic's recommandations Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:12:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1371051828-12866-1-git-send-email-celestin.matte@ensimag.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, benoit.person@ensimag.fr To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9lestin?= Matte X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 12 23:12:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UmsKz-0000s9-FS for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:12:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756585Ab3FLVMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:12:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.imag.fr ([129.88.30.5]:50723 "EHLO shiva.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756198Ab3FLVMI (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:12:08 -0400 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by shiva.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5CLC3JR014563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:12:03 +0200 Received: from anie.imag.fr ([129.88.7.32]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UmsKr-0001ZB-KV; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:12:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1371051828-12866-1-git-send-email-celestin.matte@ensimag.fr> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22C=E9lestin?= Matte"'s message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:43:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (shiva.imag.fr [129.88.30.5]); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Which commit is this based on? "git am" fails, whether I try from Junio's master, next or pu. My best try was from da608b124c76f8f7dba8a9d8f0bc8174b9744176. It seems you're based on a local commit which doesn't exist on Junio's end. Most commit in-flight are in next, so I guess rebasing the series on next would make it easier for Junio (we normally send patches against master as much as possible, see SubmittingPatches for more details). -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/