From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] add `config_set` API for caching config files Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1404280905-26763-1-git-send-email-tanayabh@gmail.com> <1404280905-26763-2-git-send-email-tanayabh@gmail.com> <53B63461.2040300@gmail.com> <53B67322.1080408@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra To: Tanay Abhra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 04 11:43:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X301m-0000RS-HX for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:43:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752217AbaGDJna (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 05:43:30 -0400 Received: from mx2.imag.fr ([129.88.30.17]:56021 "EHLO rominette.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbaGDJn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 05:43:29 -0400 Received: from clopinette.imag.fr (clopinette.imag.fr [129.88.34.215]) by rominette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s649hPOI021489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:43:25 +0200 Received: from anie.imag.fr (anie.imag.fr [129.88.7.32]) by clopinette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s649hQqK029301; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:43:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53B67322.1080408@gmail.com> (Tanay Abhra's message of "Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:55:54 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (rominette.imag.fr [129.88.30.17]); Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:43:25 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: s649hPOI021489 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1405071806.12079@Xb233wxHgYNu15+NIWgSAw Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Tanay Abhra writes: > One more doubt, does for every value has any use other than > raising semantic error in typespecific API functions. I don't see any other. My suggestion would be: ignore this for now, it's not needed to get a new API that has at least as many features as the existing one. It's easy to add to the data-structure afterwards (although a bit less easy to add to the code that fills-in the data structure). -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/