From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [Request] Git reset should be able to ignore file permissions Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git To: Alexander Nestorov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 18 18:00:46 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyKn-0004W1-QW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:00:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755921Ab3FRQAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:00:38 -0400 Received: from mx2.imag.fr ([129.88.30.17]:39887 "EHLO rominette.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755818Ab3FRQAh (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:00:37 -0400 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by rominette.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5IG0Tdp010147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:00:31 +0200 Received: from anie.imag.fr ([129.88.7.32]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyKd-0007PV-VF; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:00:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Alexander Nestorov's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:51:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (rominette.imag.fr [129.88.30.17]); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alexander Nestorov writes: > I'm home, https://github.com/alexandernst/git/commit/61f0a7d558e3cbae308fabdff66bd87569d6aa18 > Is that good? Please, post your patches inline, it eases review. More generally, read Documentation/SubmittingPatches. +Ignore file permissions:: It's not only about permissions, and it does not "ignore" them, it just notices when there's actually no change although the mtime has changed. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/