All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: matthew@mattleach.net (Matthew Leach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: GCC 4.6.x miscompiling arm-linux?
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:11:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <w51bohddcqw.fsf@mail.mattleach.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120910171654.1d4972b2@archvile> (David Jander's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:16:54 +0200")

Hi David,

David Jander <david.jander@protonic.nl> writes:
> ...
> 	.text
> 	.align	2
> 	.global	flexcan_chip_start
> 	.type	flexcan_chip_start, %function
> flexcan_chip_start:
> 	@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
> 	@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
> 	@ link register save eliminated.
> 	mov	r3, #0
> 	cmp	r0, #9
> 	str	r3, [r1, #0]
> 	ldrle	r3, [r1, #4]
> 	mov	r0, #0
> 	str	r3, [r1, #4]
> 	bx	lr
> 	.size	flexcan_chip_start, .-flexcan_chip_start
> 	.ident	"GCC: (OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.11.1) 4.6.2"
> 	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
>

This does indeed look wrong. I had a go at compile your code snippet the
following assembly was produced:

        .text
        .align  2
        .global flexcan_chip_start
        .type   flexcan_chip_start, %function
flexcan_chip_start:
        @ Function supports interworking.
        @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
        @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
        @ link register save eliminated.
        cmp     r0, #9
        mov     r3, #0
        str     r3, [r1, #0]
        mov     r0, #0
        strgt   r3, [r1, #4]
        bx      lr
        .size   flexcan_chip_start, .-flexcan_chip_start
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.3"
        .section        .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits

I think this looks correct. Perhaps you could try the angstrom arm5te
toolchain and see if it's a toolchain issue?

http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/toolchains/angstrom-2011.03-i686-linux-armv5te-linux-gnueabi-toolchain-qte-4.6.3.tar.bz2

Thanks,
Matt

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10 15:16 GCC 4.6.x miscompiling arm-linux? David Jander
2012-09-10 17:11 ` Matthew Leach [this message]
2012-09-11  7:27   ` David Jander
2012-09-11  7:54     ` David Jander
2012-09-11  8:11     ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-09-11  8:49       ` David Jander
2012-09-11  9:41         ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-09-11 10:37           ` David Jander
2012-09-11 11:35             ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-09-11 11:52               ` David Jander
2012-09-11 12:53                 ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-09-11 13:43                   ` David Jander
2012-09-11 14:10                     ` Mikael Pettersson
2012-09-13  8:38                       ` David Jander
2012-09-11  8:48     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-11  9:31       ` David Jander
2012-09-11 10:29         ` Michael Olbrich
2012-09-11 10:33           ` Matthew Leach
2012-09-11 10:42           ` David Jander
2012-09-11 13:07             ` Michael Olbrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=w51bohddcqw.fsf@mail.mattleach.net \
    --to=matthew@mattleach.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.