From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Dale Gallagher" <foobar@mighty.co.za>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM2 + Linux 2.6.1 questions
Message-ID: <web-216820999@mail01.infosat.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040127001252.A21930@cs.mcgill.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Tue Jan 27 02:15:02 2004
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

=20
> M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd <mru@kth.se> wrote:
> > I see the /dev/vg/link name.

> Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> Mine shows /dev/mapper/vg-link too.  I would definitely
> prefer
> /dev/vg/link because at least it's not implementation
> dependent... but
> I guess it's mostly an aesthetic thing.
>=20
> Any idea why yours is different?  Different version of
> mount maybe?
> Using mount-2.11z here...

I have mount-2.12 and and df (coreutils) 5.0

Dale