From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, keyong.sun@smartx.com,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:39:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.17cae5207b64e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928044102.1004310-4-wang.zhan@smartx.com>
Wang Zhan wrote:
> The bounded resegmentation added by the next patch splits an oversized TCP
> GSO skb into several GSO skbs which fit the device limits. That needs the
> GSO engine to group several MSS segments into one output skb, so let
> callers bound the number of MSS segments each output skb carries and pass
> the bound through the existing __skb_gso_segment() entry point. Ordinary
> callers use zero for no limit.
>
> Without a bound, skb_segment() groups several MSS into one output skb only
> for a device which advertises NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL or for a skb with a
> frag_list which can be split into uniform pieces, and falls back to one
> segment per skb otherwise. A caller which passes a bound asks for the
> grouping regardless, so the block which makes that decision is skipped
> when max_segs is set. Callers which pass no bound keep it, and the bounded
> path only runs for skbs which carry no frag_list.
>
> The output stays a GSO skb: gso_size is the original MSS and gso_segs is
> the number of MSS it holds, so a downstream device can still perform
> ordinary TSO. Store the bound in the existing skb_gso_cb scratch context,
> alongside the call-local data_offset and mac_offset fields, so that the
> segmentation methods keep their signature. A zero max_segs value means
> that no bound is active; it is not a persistent skb flag.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
>
> ---
> v3:
> - drop the tcp_gso_segment() exception: the caller keeps the features
> - cap the bound with GSO_MAX_SEGS instead of U16_MAX
> - drop the reset of the field in the output skbs: every caller initializes it
> - note in the kernel-doc that a bound is for TCP GSO skbs only
> - note at the frag_list gate that a bound must not go with a frag_list skb
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20260918084651.3022878-3-wang.zhan@smartx.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260917063854.2011613-3-wang.zhan@smartx.com/
> @@ -4839,7 +4840,13 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
> csum = !!can_checksum_protocol(features, proto);
>
> if (sg && csum && !gso_by_frags) {
> - if (!(features & NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL)) {
> + /*
> + * A call with max_segs set groups the MSS segments below,
> + * and the frag_list split in this block does not carry the
> + * bound, so a bound must not be passed for a skb with a
> + * frag_list.
> + */
To me this comment confuses rather than helps.
For one, it refers to "the bound" without any context.
Probably just drop.
> + if (!max_segs && !(features & NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL)) {
> struct sk_buff *iter;
> unsigned int frag_len;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 4:40 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 4:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net: core: use the packet's L3 protocol for the GSO size limit Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 3:44 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 4:01 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 14:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-28 4:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 7:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-28 4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:39 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-09-30 4:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 10:25 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 15:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 4:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: net_test: add tests for bounded GSO segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 10:30 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 15:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 4:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 4:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-09-28 5:49 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 7:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-29 11:50 ` Wang Zhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.17cae5207b64e@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=alice@isovalent.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=keyong.sun@smartx.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.