From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] net/packet: guard the ll header push in packet_rcv_spkt()
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:55:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.2d23ff6855a34@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928113108.2127215-1-quchaosheng000406@163.com>
Quchaosheng wrote:
> packet_rcv_spkt() restores the link layer header with
>
> skb_push(skb, skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb));
>
> That subtraction is only meaningful when the device actually has a link
> layer header. packet_rcv() and tpacket_rcv() both wrap it in
> dev_has_header(), which is also the predicate the block comment at the
> top of the file states the restore in terms of; packet_rcv_spkt() does
> not. commit d549699048b4 ("net/packet: fix packet receive on L3
> devices without visible hard header") introduced the helper and changed
> the two call sites, and this one stayed behind.
>
> A device without a visible ll header can leave skb->mac_header at the
> 0xFFFF sentinel that __alloc_skb() initialises it to. A CAN skb does:
> init_can_skb() sets pkt_type and ip_summed but does not reset the
> headers, and commit 9f10374bb024 ("can: remove private CAN skb
> headroom infrastructure") dropped the skb_reset_*_header() calls that
> used to be there. skb_mac_header() is then 0xFFFF, the length becomes
> a large negative number and skb_push() reports it through
> skb_under_panic() -- from softirq context, so it is a full system panic
> even with panic_on_oops=0:
>
> skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffff8bd21bc1 len:-65455 put:-65471 head:... data:... tail:0x50 end:0x180 dev:can0
> kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214!
> RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x50/0x60
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> skb_push+0x38/0x40
> packet_rcv_spkt+0xe1/0x170
> __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x7e8/0xd30
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> The socket type is reachable: packet_create() accepts SOCK_PACKET
> alongside SOCK_RAW and SOCK_DGRAM behind the same CAP_NET_RAW check,
> and neither the socket length nor a capability check keeps it away
> from a CAN interface.
>
> The missing skb_reset_*_header() calls in init_can_skb() are a
> regression in their own right and are being fixed separately, but a
> packet socket should not turn a link layer that did not initialise its
> mac header into a kernel panic. Guard the push the way the other two
> receive paths do.
>
> Tested on v7.3-rc5 under QEMU with a slcan device on a pty, which is
> the driver RX path: vcan does not reproduce it, because can_send()
> resets the headers on the way out. One SOCK_PACKET socket bound to
> can0 and one frame written into the line discipline panics an
> unpatched kernel with the trace above; the same image with this patch
> prints no panic and powers off normally. Both kernels are this tree,
> defconfig plus CONFIG_CAN_SLCAN=y, differing only in this hunk.
>
> Fixes: d549699048b4 ("net/packet: fix packet receive on L3 devices without visible hard header")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
> ---
>
> Hello Oliver,
>
> Removed the comment block, as you suggested. You are right that the other
> two dev_has_header() call sites do not carry one, and that the block
> comment at the top of the file already states the invariant -- so the
> comment was only restating the commit message. The hunk is the guard
> alone now, two lines.
>
> No behaviour change from v2: same predicate, same push. I re-ran the
> QEMU/slcan pair on this exact revision to be sure nothing else moved with
> it -- unpatched still panics with skb_under_panic len:-65455 out of
> packet_rcv_spkt+0xe1 in interrupt, patched prints no panic and powers off
> normally. checkpatch is clean on the resulting diff.
>
> Thanks for the review,
> Quchaosheng
> net/packet/af_packet.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 7c83e01526ed..a951a1e3c088 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -1911,7 +1911,8 @@ static int packet_rcv_spkt(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>
> spkt = &PACKET_SKB_CB(skb)->sa.pkt;
>
> - skb_push(skb, skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb));
> + if (dev_has_header(dev))
> + skb_push(skb, skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb));
Since SOCK_PACKET is equivalent to SOCK_RAW, this looks like a
legitimate fix to me.
An earlier version of the patch gave a different reason: that CAN had
removed skb_reset_mac_header. This is a not a fix for that change,
agreed? Other locations in the stack also require it initialized, also
on devices without mac header.
I see that there is another CAN patch that reverts that change:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260917123716.63116-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com/#r
Specifically to packet sockets, also see the detailed comments on this
point at the top of net/packet/af_packet.c
Small aside: please remember to not send more than 1 revision per 24h,
per Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
>
> /*
> * The SOCK_PACKET socket receives _all_ frames.
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 11:31 [PATCH v3 net] net/packet: guard the ll header push in packet_rcv_spkt() Quchaosheng
2026-09-28 22:55 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-09-29 7:36 ` Quchaosheng
2026-09-29 14:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 14:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 23:32 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 1:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-02 1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.2d23ff6855a34@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quchaosheng000406@163.com \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.