From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Hassan Sultan" <hassansultan@google.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] selftests: net: tuntap: fix UDP checksum length in build_udp_packet_csum()
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 21:10:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.316a1799578d9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103203113.550604-3-edumazet@kernel.org>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> build_udp_packet_csum() passes udph->len, which is in network byte
> order, as the number of bytes to checksum. On little-endian hosts this
> reads up to 64KB past the UDP header and computes a wrong checksum.
>
> Existing callers did not crash only because they use packet buffers
> of MAX_VNET_TUNNEL_PACKET_SZ bytes.
>
> Use ntohs(udph->len), as tap.c does in its own build_udp_packet().
>
> Fixes: a942fcd72e97 ("selftest: tun: Introduce tuntap_helpers.h header for TUN/TAP testing")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/tuntap_helpers.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tuntap_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tuntap_helpers.h
> index d6c0437136ec..ac9b2da57a6d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tuntap_helpers.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tuntap_helpers.h
> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static inline void build_udp_packet_csum(uint8_t *buf, int family,
> sum += htons(IPPROTO_UDP) + udph->len;
>
> if (!csum_off)
> - sum += add_csum(buf, udph->len);
> + sum += add_csum(buf, ntohs(udph->len));
>
> udph->check = finish_ip_csum(sum);
If respinning: we probably should also do CSUM_MANGLED_0 conversion here.
And to zero udph->check first. All existing callers do. But the calloc in
patch 3/3 does not.
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 20:31 [PATCH net 0/3] net: virtio: validate outer protocol of UDP tunnel GSO packets Eric Dumazet
2026-11-03 20:31 ` [PATCH net 1/3] " Eric Dumazet
2026-11-04 2:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-11-04 4:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-11-04 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:32 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 20:31 ` [PATCH net 2/3] selftests: net: tuntap: fix UDP checksum length in build_udp_packet_csum() Eric Dumazet
2026-11-04 2:10 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-11-04 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 20:31 ` [PATCH net 3/3] selftests: net: tun: test outer protocol of UDP tunnel GSO packets Eric Dumazet
2026-11-04 2:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-11-04 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:32 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.316a1799578d9@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hassansultan@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.