All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,  davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,  edumazet@google.com,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	 andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,  horms@kernel.org,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 shuah@kernel.org,  willemb@google.com,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: gro: signal over-coalescing more reliably
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 09:49:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.ee6597e4f7af@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260607002401.212976-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> GRO test is very timing-sensitive, packets may be delayed
> by the network or just sent slowly. Because of this we retry
> each test case up to 6 times.
> 
> This makes perfect sense for positive cases, in which we want
> to see coalescing. Negative test cases, which modify headers
> and expect no coalescing should have opposite treatment.
> We should really try 6 times and make sure that each time
> the test failed. This would, however, require that we annotate
> each test to indicate whether its positive or negative.
> Let's start with a simpler improvement. Do not allow
> retries if we detected over-coalescing. Previously the negative
> case would have to get lucky at least once in 6 tries to pass.
> Now the first failure breaks the retry loop.
> 
> For background - NICs tend to ignore the contents of the TCP
> timestamp option, so that test case commonly fails. In NIPA
> having 6 attempts, however, was enough for some NICs to get
> multiple successful runs in a row, getting the test cases
> auto-classified as expected to pass, even tho the NIC does
> not comply with the expectations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-07 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-07  0:24 [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: gro: signal over-coalescing more reliably Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-07 13:49 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.ee6597e4f7af@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.