All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Flush the patch area TLB entry locally
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 14:42:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wlqu5lej.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44406eef-0035-4d6f-a2b0-3647d7c1ea2e@kernel.org>

"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org> writes:

> Le 03/11/2026 à 03:54, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) a écrit :
>> patching functions like patch_mem() and patch_instructions(), maps the
>> target page at the per-cpu text_poke_area, write it, clear the PTE and
>> then flushes the tlb using flush_tlb_kernel_range(), with interrupts
>> disabled. flush_tlb_kernel_range() on SMP nohash (e500) does an IPI
>> based TLB invalidation i.e -
>> 
>> 	smp_call_function(do_flush_tlb_mm_ipi, NULL, 1);
>> 
>> ...which will wait for other CPUs but with interrupts off. This can be
>> caught by lockdep with the following warning:
>> 
>>    WARNING: kernel/smp.c:917 at smp_call_function_many_cond+0x430/0x818, CPU#1: swapper/0/1
>>    CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc1-leds-v4 #1 PREEMPT
>>    Hardware name: Turris 1.1 e500v2 0x80211051 Freescale P2020
>>    Call Trace:
>>    [c1915bc0] [c001be04] flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x2c/0x74
>>    [c1915bd0] [c001ce2c] patch_instructions+0x1b0/0x318
>>    [c1915c20] [c003113c] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x5c/0xb4
>>    [c1915c40] [c01c3398] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x28/0x8c
>>    [c1915c60] [c0031770] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x5dc/0x758
>>    ...
>>    [c1915dd0] [c102e114] ptp_classifier_init+0x30/0x4c
>>    [c1915df0] [c102d3a8] sock_init+0xc8/0xe4
>>    ...
>>    hardirqs last disabled at (3076): [<c001ceb4>] patch_instructions+0x238/0x318
>> 
>> Josef confirmed that this was causing a hang (deadlock):
>>      I think this is why the CZ.NIC Turris 1.1 hangs early in boot with
>>      CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y. On 6.18.44 it hung in 19 of 19 boots and booted
>>      fine 9 of 9 times with jump labels off. The hang comes while static
>>      keys are patched and modules are loaded, nothing is printed and the
>>      watchdog resets the board. OpenWrt keeps jump labels off on these
>>      boards for now.
>> 
>> ...which is possible if both cpus are doing similar operations with interrupts
>> off and doing TLB invalidation using IPI.
>> 
>> Broadcast TLB invalidation is not needed here since text_poke_area is
>> a per-cpu area. It is mapped and unmapped with interrupts disabled by
>> it's own cpu. The only reason I think, if we would need a broadcast tlb
>> invalidate is, when we want to prevent a stray or malicious write to
>> this cpu text_poke_area by another CPU. This generally gets solved with
>> temporary-mm path like how Radix and even x86 implements. However, booke
>> doesn't implement that, so for now let's ensure we use local tlb
>> flushing for correctness.
>
> This problem was already discussed one year ago, see 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/PA3P192MB2865C07D634E3B775D003C7F8CD7A@PA3P192MB2865.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
>
> See response from Arnd, a stop_machine() should be done for completeness.
>

I will have to take sometime to go over what ARM does here with
stop_machine(). However, either ways I think, we still need this fix,
since otherwise P2020 boards gets hung during boot. Thoughts?


>> 
>> Fixes: 49e3d8ea6248 ("powerpc/fsl_booke: Enable STRICT_KERNEL_RWX")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261026195644.16384-1-pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com/
>> Tested-by: Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>> index 44ff9f684bef..6351342fa5c3 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>> @@ -276,6 +276,23 @@ static int __do_patch_mem_mm(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword)
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> 
>> +/*
>> + * The patch area is per-CPU and only used by its own CPU, with IRQs
>> + * disabled, so only the local TLB can hold an entry for it.
>> + *
>> + * On nohash SMP, flush_tlb_kernel_range() IPIs the other CPUs and waits, which
>> + * must not be done with IRQs disabled (see smp_call_function_many_cond()), so
>> + * flush just the local kernel (PID 0) entry.
>> + * Book3S keeps flush_tlb_kernel_range() which doesn't IPI here.
>> + */
>> +static void flush_patch_area(unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S))
>
> CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S not consistant with commit message. Are you adressing 
> a problem on e500 only ? on all not book3s ? What about book3s/32 ? What 
> about 8xx ? Even for book3s/64, is it correct at all when 
> mm_patch_enabled() returns false ?
>

No we are addressing the problem on all NOHASH platforms. IIUC, all
!BOOK3S are "nohash". Although some of them maybe UP, so it doesn't
matter whether a flush_tlb_kernel_range() is called or
local_flush_tlb_page() - it wouldn't matter. And on others which are SMP
but do not have STRICT_KERNEL_RWX enabled, they will anyway not go
through this path - but if they ever do - then we should ensure they too
do a local_flush_tlb_range() to avoid the same deadlock.

However, I think, maybe we could use CONFIG_PPC_MMU_NOHASH instead of using
CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S, thoughts?


-ritesh

>> +		flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	else
>> +		local_flush_tlb_page(NULL, addr);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __do_patch_mem(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword)
>>   {
>>   	int err;
>> @@ -296,7 +313,7 @@ static int __do_patch_mem(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword)
>>   	err = __patch_mem(addr, val, patch_addr, is_dword);
>> 
>>   	pte_clear(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte);
>> -	flush_tlb_kernel_range(text_poke_addr, text_poke_addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	flush_patch_area(text_poke_addr);
>> 
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> @@ -488,7 +505,7 @@ static int __do_patch_instructions(u32 *addr, u32 *code, size_t len, bool repeat
>>   	err = __patch_instructions(patch_addr, code, len, repeat_instr);
>> 
>>   	pte_clear(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte);
>> -	flush_tlb_kernel_range(text_poke_addr, text_poke_addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	flush_patch_area(text_poke_addr);
>> 
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03  2:54 [PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Flush the patch area TLB entry locally Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-11-03  7:33 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-11-03  9:12   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2026-11-04  7:04     ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-11-04 10:37       ` Ritesh Harjani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wlqu5lej.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.