From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Subject: BAT mapping From: "Linh Dang" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:23:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1088518106.14216.1415.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> (David Woodhouse's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:08:27 -0400") Message-ID: References: <1088518106.14216.1415.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hi, I'm porting Linux to our proprietary boards. it's 7447-based with gt64260 bridge. We used vanilla 2.6.7 from kernel.org. It worked out well (2 person/grunt/slave-dats to get it linux booted and with nfs/telnet/gdb...) thank you very much for your work. In the porting process, we change the bat mapping to used all the 8 DBAT registers. our new algorithm is quite generic and will work for cpu without hi_bats as well. My question is why it was NOT done this way but hard-coded to bat2 and bat3. Am I missing some subtle things? Thanx -- Linh Dang ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/