From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: "Sharma\, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Larry.Finger\@lwfinger.net" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
"devel\@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix Warning reported by checkpatch.
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:46:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfj61er2eut.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FDC088D3B5555644AE135ED28A7ABDE950E8B904@EU-MBX-02.mgc.mentorg.com> (Sanjeev Sharma's message of "Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:00:19 +0000")
"Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com> writes:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 9:13 PM
> To: Sharma, Sanjeev
> Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net; Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com;
> devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix Warning reported by
> checkpatch.
>
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:06:36PM +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
>> This is a patch to the rtw_cmd.c file that fixes following Warning by
>> introducing temporary structure.
>>
>> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c | 123
>> +++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> Same as the other patch, give us a hint as to the warning in the subject.
>
> This patch is Fix of Warning introduced in Previous patch while fixing " ERROR: spaces required around that '>' (ctx:WxV)".Can I mentioned dependency or hint in subject line or do we have
> another way to described these type of fix.(One patch introduced another Warning/Error)
When replying to these messages, please do it properly with proper
quoting. Do NOT resend other peoples' emails with just an
"-----Original Message-----" line and no comments and no indentation of
the message you respond to.
If you have any questions, please read:
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
Jes
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c
>> index 4eaa502..6186575 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c
>> @@ -919,34 +919,34 @@ static void traffic_status_watchdog(struct rtw_adapter *padapter)
>> u8 bHigherBusyTxTraffic = false;
>> struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &padapter->mlmepriv;
>> int BusyThreshold = 100;
>> + struct rt_link_detect *ldi = &pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo;
>> +
>> /* */
>> /* Determine if our traffic is busy now */
>> /* */
>> if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) {
>> if (rtl8723a_BT_coexist(padapter))
>> BusyThreshold = 50;
>> - else if (pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bBusyTraffic)
>> + else if (ldi->bBusyTraffic)
>> BusyThreshold = 75;
>> /* if we raise bBusyTraffic in last watchdog, using
>> lower threshold. */
>> - if (pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxOkInPeriod > BusyThreshold ||
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod > BusyThreshold) {
>> + if (ldi->NumRxOkInPeriod > BusyThreshold ||
>> + ldi->NumTxOkInPeriod > BusyThreshold) {
>> bBusyTraffic = true;
>>
>> - if (pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxOkInPeriod >
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod)
>> + if (ldi->NumRxOkInPeriod > ldi->NumTxOkInPeriod)
>> bRxBusyTraffic = true;
>> else
>> bTxBusyTraffic = true;
>> }
>>
>> /* Higher Tx/Rx data. */
>> - if (pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxOkInPeriod > 4000 ||
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod > 4000) {
>> + if (ldi->NumRxOkInPeriod > 4000 ||
>> + ldi->NumTxOkInPeriod > 4000) {
>> bHigherBusyTraffic = true;
>>
>> - if (pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxOkInPeriod >
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod)
>> + if (ldi->NumRxOkInPeriod > ldi->NumTxOkInPeriod)
>> bHigherBusyRxTraffic = true;
>> else
>> bHigherBusyTxTraffic = true;
>> @@ -955,9 +955,9 @@ static void traffic_status_watchdog(struct rtw_adapter *padapter)
>> if (!rtl8723a_BT_coexist(padapter) ||
>> !rtl8723a_BT_using_antenna_1(padapter)) {
>> /* check traffic for powersaving. */
>> - if (((pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod +
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod) > 8) ||
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod >2)
>> + if (((ldi->NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod +
>> + ldi->NumTxOkInPeriod) > 8) ||
>> + ldi->NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod > 2)
>> bEnterPS = false;
>> else
>> bEnterPS = true;
>> @@ -971,15 +971,15 @@ static void traffic_status_watchdog(struct rtw_adapter *padapter)
>> } else
>> LPS_Leave23a(padapter);
>>
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxOkInPeriod = 0;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod = 0;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod = 0;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bBusyTraffic = bBusyTraffic;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bTxBusyTraffic = bTxBusyTraffic;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bRxBusyTraffic = bRxBusyTraffic;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bHigherBusyTraffic = bHigherBusyTraffic;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bHigherBusyRxTraffic = bHigherBusyRxTraffic;
>> - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bHigherBusyTxTraffic = bHigherBusyTxTraffic;
>> + ldi->NumRxOkInPeriod = 0;
>> + ldi->NumTxOkInPeriod = 0;
>> + ldi->NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod = 0;
>> + ldi->bBusyTraffic = bBusyTraffic;
>> + ldi->bTxBusyTraffic = bTxBusyTraffic;
>> + ldi->bRxBusyTraffic = bRxBusyTraffic;
>> + ldi->bHigherBusyTraffic = bHigherBusyTraffic;
>> + ldi->bHigherBusyRxTraffic = bHigherBusyRxTraffic;
>> + ldi->bHigherBusyTxTraffic = bHigherBusyTxTraffic;
>> }
>>
>> static void dynamic_chk_wk_hdl(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u8
>> *pbuf, int sz) @@ -1017,46 +1017,44 @@ static void lps_ctrl_wk_hdl(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u8 lps_ctrl_type)
>> check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_STATE))
>> return;
>>
>> - switch (lps_ctrl_type)
>> - {
>> - case LPS_CTRL_SCAN:
>> - rtl8723a_BT_wifiscan_notify(padapter, true);
>> - if (!rtl8723a_BT_using_antenna_1(padapter)) {
>> - if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED))
>> - LPS_Leave23a(padapter);
>> - }
>> - break;
>> - case LPS_CTRL_JOINBSS:
>> - LPS_Leave23a(padapter);
>> - break;
>> - case LPS_CTRL_CONNECT:
>> - mstatus = 1;/* connect */
>> - /* Reset LPS Setting */
>> - padapter->pwrctrlpriv.LpsIdleCount = 0;
>> - rtl8723a_set_FwJoinBssReport_cmd(padapter, 1);
>> - rtl8723a_BT_mediastatus_notify(padapter, mstatus);
>> - break;
>> - case LPS_CTRL_DISCONNECT:
>> - mstatus = 0;/* disconnect */
>> - rtl8723a_BT_mediastatus_notify(padapter, mstatus);
>> - if (!rtl8723a_BT_using_antenna_1(padapter))
>> - LPS_Leave23a(padapter);
>> - rtl8723a_set_FwJoinBssReport_cmd(padapter, 0);
>> - break;
>> - case LPS_CTRL_SPECIAL_PACKET:
>> - pwrpriv->DelayLPSLastTimeStamp = jiffies;
>> - rtl8723a_BT_specialpacket_notify(padapter);
>> - if (!rtl8723a_BT_using_antenna_1(padapter))
>> - LPS_Leave23a(padapter);
>> - break;
>> - case LPS_CTRL_LEAVE:
>> - rtl8723a_BT_lps_leave(padapter);
>> - if (!rtl8723a_BT_using_antenna_1(padapter))
>> + switch (lps_ctrl_type) {
>> + case LPS_CTRL_SCAN:
>> + rtl8723a_BT_wifiscan_notify(padapter, true);
>> + if (!rtl8723a_BT_using_antenna_1(padapter)) {
>> + if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED))
>> LPS_Leave23a(padapter);
>
> You are doing more than one thing here, something you did not specify in your changelog above, which isn't ok :(
>
> Please fix up and resend.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-07 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 7:59 [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix error reported by checkpatch Sanjeev Sharma
2014-10-27 8:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2014-10-27 14:52 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-29 6:35 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-10-30 14:50 ` Jes Sorensen
2014-11-05 11:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Sanjeev Sharma
2014-11-05 16:27 ` Greg KH
2014-11-06 6:37 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-11-05 17:15 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-06 5:41 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH] " Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-11-06 6:16 ` Sanjeev Sharma
2014-11-06 15:41 ` Greg KH
2014-11-07 11:56 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-11-06 6:36 ` [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix Warning " Sanjeev Sharma
2014-11-06 15:43 ` Greg KH
2014-11-07 12:00 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-11-07 15:46 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2014-11-11 7:54 ` [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Added missing space " Sanjeev Sharma
2014-11-11 9:58 ` [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix checkpatch warning Sanjeev Sharma
2014-10-30 7:47 ` [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix error reported by checkpatch Jes Sorensen
2014-10-29 6:32 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2014-10-30 14:49 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfj61er2eut.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.