All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: Dan Lenski <dlenski@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtl8xxxu: Increase default polling timeout for firmware startup
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 23:35:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfja8jo3unl.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463534086-22353-2-git-send-email-dlenski@gmail.com> (Dan Lenski's message of "Tue, 17 May 2016 18:14:45 -0700")

Dan Lenski <dlenski@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch increases the default value for the maximum number of polling
> loops to wait for the rtl8xxxu MCU to start after the firmware is loaded
> (from 1000 to 5000).
>
> With RTL8723AU chipset, I frequently encounter "Firmware failed to start"
> errors from rtl8xxxu after a cold boot.
>
> It appears that other chipsets supported by the driver have the same
> problem. Here are a couple of relevant bug reports:
> - http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2321756
> - https://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com/msg4942468.html
>
> This issue seems to occur because RTL8XXXU_FIRMWARE_POLL_MAX (1000) is
> too short, and the MCU fails to start up as quickly as expected.
>
> With a longer value (5000), the driver starts up consistently and
> successfully after cold-boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Lenski <dlenski@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

As previously pointed out, please provide some details about the system
where this goes wrong.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
> index f2a1bac..39c6ce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
>  #define TX_PAGE_NUM_NORM_PQ		0x02
>  
>  #define RTL_FW_PAGE_SIZE		4096
> -#define RTL8XXXU_FIRMWARE_POLL_MAX	1000
> +#define RTL8XXXU_FIRMWARE_POLL_MAX	5000

This is a long delay - how about 2000?

Jes

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-18  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-18  1:14 [PATCH 0/2] rtl8xxxu: increase polling timeout for firmware startup Dan Lenski
2016-05-18  1:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtl8xxxu: Increase default " Dan Lenski
2016-05-18  1:20   ` Julian Calaby
2016-05-18  3:35   ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2016-05-18  4:03     ` Daniel Lenski
2016-05-18 14:57       ` Jes Sorensen
2016-05-18  1:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtl8xxxu: Make polling timeout for firmware configurable Dan Lenski
2016-05-18  1:21   ` Julian Calaby
2016-05-18  3:36   ` Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wrfja8jo3unl.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlenski@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.