Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for lots of arrays

[Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>]

Mike Lovell <mlovell@bluehost.com> writes:
> ping. its been about 2 week since i posted these. just following up on it.

Hi,

I think you sent it while I was traveling - I'll try to get to it within
the next couple of days.

Thanks for the reminder.

Jes

>
> mike
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Mike Lovell <mlovell@bluehost.com> wrote:
>> This patch series fixes two issues around having more than 127 arrays on a
>> system. The first one fixes an issue with using a dev_t as int and the
>> number going negative when the array number would be larger than 2<<19. This
>> would happen when more than 128 arrays were created on the system without
>> creating the arrays by name. Manually specifying the large number would also
>> fail.
>>
>> The second patch changes find_free_devnm in mdopen.c to use go to (2<<9)-1
>> after 128 arrays have been created. Newer versions of the kernel don't allow
>> the user to specify an array number than 511 so mdadm shouldn't automatically
>> choose a bigger number. There was discussion about checking for new_array
>> in /sys/module/md_mod/parameters on the list but that parameter has been in
>> the kernel since 2.6.29. Any kernel from the last 7 years would still be
>> limited by the check so it probably isn't worth a special case.
>>
>> Mike Lovell (2):
>>   Use dev_t for devnm2devid and devid2devnm
>>   Change behavior in find_free_devnm when wrapping around.
>>
>>  Detail.c  | 4 ++--
>>  Grow.c    | 2 +-
>>  lib.c     | 2 +-
>>  mapfile.c | 2 +-
>>  mdadm.h   | 4 ++--
>>  mdopen.c  | 6 +++---
>>  util.c    | 6 +++---
>>  7 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>