All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	 Achu Luma <ach.lumap@gmail.com>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org,  chriscool@tuxfamily.org,
	christian.couder@gmail.com,  me@ttaylorr.com,
	phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk,  steadmon@google.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy][PATCH v5] Port helper/test-ctype.c to unit-tests/t-ctype.c
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:52:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1qah12ej.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41cf1944-2456-4115-a934-aff2306a26e5@web.de> ("René Scharfe"'s message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:27:13 +0100")

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:

> Am 16.01.24 um 16:38 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Thanks for adding back the test for EOF, this version looks good to me.
>>
>> Thanks.  Let's merge it to 'next'.
>
> OK.  I'm still interested in replies to my question in
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/a087f57c-ce72-45c7-8182-f38d0aca9030@web.de/,
> i.e. whether we should have one TEST per class or one per class and
> character -- or in a broader sense: What's the ideal scope of a TEST?
> But I can ask it again in the form of a follow-up patch.

I personally do not have a good answer, but those who are interested
in unit-tests more than I do should have their opinions to share ;-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-16 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-21 23:15 [PATCH] Port helper/test-ctype.c to unit-tests/t-ctype.c Achu Luma
2023-12-26 18:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-12-27 10:57   ` Christian Couder
2023-12-27 11:57     ` René Scharfe
2023-12-27 14:40       ` Phillip Wood
2023-12-27 23:48       ` Junio C Hamano
2023-12-28 16:05         ` René Scharfe
2024-01-02 18:55   ` Taylor Blau
2023-12-30  0:09 ` [Outreachy][PATCH v2] " Achu Luma
2024-01-01 10:40   ` [Outreachy][PATCH v3] " Achu Luma
2024-01-01 16:41     ` René Scharfe
2024-01-02 16:35       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-05 16:14     ` [Outreachy][PATCH v4] " Achu Luma
2024-01-07 12:45       ` René Scharfe
2024-01-08 22:32         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-09 10:35       ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-09 17:12         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-12 10:27       ` [Outreachy][PATCH v5] " Achu Luma
2024-01-15 10:39         ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-16 15:38           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-16 19:27             ` René Scharfe
2024-01-16 19:45               ` Christian Couder
2024-01-16 19:52               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-01-17  5:37               ` Josh Steadmon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq1qah12ej.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ach.lumap@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=steadmon@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.