From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E611FAFB for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933214AbdCaQBV (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:01:21 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63846 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933149AbdCaQBU (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:01:20 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949527A7F6; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:01:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Rw8oIeOp2ne3dNKg+0EkkWMXTWE=; b=akHd+l /sMbjybpMkXpiAb7OB7B5hYhWH96Mh0f/bCLrML7S+KFYSqGDsdeEHIAhiLpkznz W9SwPgrPjfA5MQbGtO02XZgAN6k+bjL2An60a49XnzhQxv5NC/Xx1TJcA1kYGNij LQmMwdCO/patqjMlFOB62oXnCXXYZkyoGr2c8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=a2Exc703UwLnFu6L5vE9URLVDzzrHUkg wUN33uXKKYcsHlzzX52Iau+nEdaSfAh1bEFevnyN0lpMfYtUBdCu+oybIbh9weUa F/XpGu1u8maJihbG/0GxiZau1gHdQTHUxwK8ups/N3ilbGX4kcRJa8fW+4Z5sPQ8 IoB80WoJ9is= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA347A7F5; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:01:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E66AD7A7F4; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:01:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael Haggerty Cc: Jeff King , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Stefan Beller , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , David Turner , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] Separate `ref_cache` into a separate module References: Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:01:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Michael Haggerty's message of "Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:10:58 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 467EFB42-162B-11E7-8DBA-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael Haggerty writes: > This version literally only contains a few commit message changes and > one minor comment changes relative to v1. The code is identical. I > wasn't sure whether it is even worth sending this patch series to the > ML again; Junio, if you'd prefer I just send a link to a published > branch in such cases, please let me know. The review on the list is not about letting me pick it up, but is about giving reviewing contributors a chance to comment. I think for a series this important ;-) it is good that you are giving it multiple exposures so that people who were offline the last time can have a chance to look at it, even if the update is minimum. > This patch series is also available from my GitHub fork [2] as branch > "separate-ref-cache". These patches depend on Duy's > nd/files-backend-git-dir branch. I am getting the impression that the files-backend thing as well as this topic are ready for 'next'. Please stop me if I missed something in these topics (especially the other one) that needs updating before that happens. Thanks.