All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Matt Hunter" <m@lfurio.us>
Cc: "Colin Hinton" <colinlewishinton@gmail.com>,  <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remote.c: defer remote.<name>.followRemoteHEAD validation
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 08:12:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq33tnz0hb.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DMHZCS9LOW3N.ZJ3947HUCXZ8@lfurio.us> (Matt Hunter's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2026 03:04:55 -0400")

"Matt Hunter" <m@lfurio.us> writes:

> On Wed Oct 28, 2026 at 10:26 AM EDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>>> This part of the code becomes overly deeply indented, and more
>>>> importantly, the outer conditional around here has been reworked by
>>>> another topic and the code that learns follow_remote_head will have
>>>> to be reused elsewhere, which would lead to a nasty merge conflict.
> ...
> I wonder if it makes sense to incorporate such a new helper function
> into the existing 'get_follow_remote_head()', since it would be the only
> place using it.

I am not sure what being the only place has to do with avoiding to
split a helper function out to clarify the main logic flow, though.
And simultaneously, another topic wants to have this piece of logic
twice.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-30 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-18 23:55 [PATCH v1] remote.c: defer remote.<name>.followRemoteHEAD validation Colin Hinton
2026-10-19 15:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-19 21:24 ` Matt Hunter
2026-10-21 16:30   ` Colin Hinton
2026-10-22 12:39     ` Matt Hunter
2026-10-23 18:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Colin Hinton
2026-10-23 21:59   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-24  9:28   ` Matt Hunter
2026-10-24 16:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-25  2:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-28  2:56     ` Colin Hinton
2026-10-28 14:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30  7:04         ` Matt Hunter
2026-10-30 15:12           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-11-01  0:00             ` Matt Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq33tnz0hb.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=colinlewishinton@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@lfurio.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.