Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes:

> On Sun, Sep 27, 2026, at 14:50, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/t/t3206-range-diff.sh b/t/t3206-range-diff.sh
>>> index ef92704de39..640c5dec52e 100755
>>> --- a/t/t3206-range-diff.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t3206-range-diff.sh
>>> ...
>>> +# The '--range-diff-notes' has no effect but is allowed
>>> +test_expect_success 'format-patch --range-diff-notes=not-a-note (no --range-diff)' '
>>> +	test_when_finished "rm -f 000?-*" &&
>>> +	git format-patch --range-diff-notes=not-a-note --cover-letter \
>>> +		main..unmodified &&
>>> +	test_when_finished "rm -f 000?-*" &&
>>> +	test_file_not_empty 0000-cover-letter* &&
>>> +	test_grep ! "^Range-diff:" 0000-cover-letter* &&
>>> +	test_grep ! "## Notes " 0000-cover-letter*
>>> +'
>>
>> The second test_when_finished is redundant, I suspect.
>
> Oh yeah. If there is no Range-diff then
> there won't be a notes section. I'll fix that
> in the next version.

I do not understand that comment.  I was merely saying that you are
registering the same clean-up-when-we-are-done handler twice.
Having the earlier invocation of "test_when_finished rm -f 000?-*"
shoud be sufficient.  It does not make a difference whether we have
notes in the range-diff or not.