All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  ps@pks.im
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] odb/transaction: add transaction finalize interface
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:38:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq33wm8x20.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809190106.1565882-2-jltobler@gmail.com> (Justin Tobler's message of "Sun, 9 Aug 2026 14:01:00 -0500")

Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:

> diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c
> index 60ffbede2b..501e114ed5 100644
> --- a/builtin/add.c
> +++ b/builtin/add.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int cmd_add(int argc,
>  	char *seen = NULL;
>  	char *ps_matched = NULL;
>  	struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
> -	struct odb_transaction *transaction;
> +	struct odb_transaction *transaction = NULL;
>  
>  	repo_config(repo, add_config, NULL);
>  
> @@ -610,5 +610,6 @@ int cmd_add(int argc,
>  	free(ps_matched);
>  	dir_clear(&dir);
>  	clear_pathspec(&pathspec);
> +	odb_transaction_finalize(transaction);
>  	return exit_status;
>  }

There is only one non-local exit between transation-begin and
transaction-finalize, which is a call ot report_path_error()
followed by exit(128).  Will _finalize() stay to be just freeing
memory and nothing else?  It may be conceptually cleaner to jump to
the bottom to make sure the clean-up sequence will always happen.

The same comment applies to other codepaths to which this patch adds
_finalize() calls.

> diff --git a/odb/transaction.c b/odb/transaction.c
> index dab7da6a9a..9e9a982778 100644
> --- a/odb/transaction.c
> +++ b/odb/transaction.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ int odb_transaction_commit(struct odb_transaction *transaction)
>  
>  	ret = transaction->commit(transaction);
>  	transaction->source->odb->transaction = NULL;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int odb_transaction_finalize(struct odb_transaction *transaction)
> +{

Curiously no callers added by this patch checks the return value
of this function.  Intended or just sloppy?  If the former, perhaps
this wants to return void instead?

The same can be said for _commit(), by the way.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 21:38 [PATCH 0/6] builtin/receive-pack: support pluggable packfile writes Justin Tobler
2026-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] odb/transaction: add transaction release interface Justin Tobler
2026-08-07  7:03   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-07 15:11     ` Justin Tobler
2026-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] builtin/receive-pack: pass shallow file explicitly Justin Tobler
2026-08-07  7:03   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] builtin/receive-pack: lift global state out of unpack() Justin Tobler
2026-08-07  7:03   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-07 15:33     ` Justin Tobler
2026-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] builtin/receive-pack: report unpack errors via strbuf Justin Tobler
2026-08-07  7:03   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-07 15:36     ` Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:00       ` Justin Tobler
2026-08-10  5:15         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] builtin/receive-pack: explicitly pass packfile fd Justin Tobler
2026-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] odb/transaction: add transaction interface to write packfiles Justin Tobler
2026-08-07  7:03   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-07 16:01     ` Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] builtin/receive-pack: support pluggable packfile writes Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] odb/transaction: add transaction finalize interface Justin Tobler
2026-08-10  3:38     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] builtin/receive-pack: pass shallow file explicitly Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] builtin/receive-pack: read unpack limit config lazily Justin Tobler
2026-08-10  5:15     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] builtin/receive-pack: lift global state out of unpack() Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] builtin/receive-pack: report unpack errors via strbuf Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] builtin/receive-pack: explicitly pass packfile fd Justin Tobler
2026-08-09 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] odb/transaction: add transaction interface to write packfiles Justin Tobler
2026-08-10  1:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-10  4:02     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq33wm8x20.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.