From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clean up some MAYBE_UNUSED cases
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:46:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq34mnukff.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829200807.GA430283@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:08:07 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> - builtin/gc.c's check_crontab_process(). The whole function is marked
> as MAYBE_UNUSED here, which is a little funny. It's because
> is_crontab_available() may or may not call us based on __APPLE__.
> Should we conditionally define the function, too, in that case? It
> would mean repeating the #ifdef. Alternatively, we could define it
> like this:
>
> #ifdef __APPLE__
> static int check_crontab_process(const char *cmd UNUSED)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> #else
> static int check_crontab_process(const char *cmd UNUSED)
> {
> [...the real function...]
> }
> #endif
Or inline the body of check_crontab_process() at its sole callsite
(the other side of "#ifdef APPLE") in is_crontab_available() and get
rid of check_crontab_process().
> But I think we're getting into "well, this is how I would have
> written it" territory, and it doesn't matter much either way in
> practice. It's probably better to just leave it alone.
OK.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 20:08 [PATCH 0/2] clean up some MAYBE_UNUSED cases Jeff King
2024-08-29 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] gc: drop MAYBE_UNUSED annotation from used parameter Jeff King
2024-08-29 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] grep: prefer UNUSED to MAYBE_UNUSED for pcre allocators Jeff King
2024-08-29 20:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-08-30 6:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-08-30 16:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-29 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq34mnukff.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.