From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] push: make 'set-upstream' have dafault arguments
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 12:35:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq35m3ck7s.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104132839.1209-1-chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com> (Abhradeep Chakraborty's message of "Tue, 4 Jan 2022 18:58:39 +0530")
Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com> writes:
> * For push.default=upstream, If an upstream is already defined then
> 'git push -u' should only set that branch as the upstream of the
> local branch. This already works in git. But if an upstream is not
> provied, it should throw error. So, I am not sure whether 'git push
> -u' (with no upstream information) should create a new branch with
> the same name or not. What do you think about that?
I think erring on the side of caution is more sensible than blindly
assuming that the user wants a new branch with the same name.
Thank you for working on the topic and thinking its ramifications
through.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 14:43 [RFC PATCH 0/1] making --set-upstream have default arguments Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-02 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] push: make '-u' " Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-02 18:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-03 8:14 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-03 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-03 19:27 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-03 11:32 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] making --set-upstream " Philip Oakley
2021-12-03 16:03 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-03 16:46 ` Philip Oakley
2021-12-03 17:28 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-07 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 " Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] push: make '-u' " Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-07 22:14 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-08 6:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] push: make '-u' have default argument Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-09 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] making --set-upstream have default arguments Abhradeep Chakraborty
2021-12-09 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] push: make '-u' " Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-01-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] making --set-upstream " Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-01-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] push: make 'set-upstream' have dafault arguments Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-01-04 3:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 13:28 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-01-04 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq35m3ck7s.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.