From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sbeller@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xdiff/xpatience: support anchoring line(s)
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:16:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq3755sprp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa7zdsqb6.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:05:01 +0900")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
>
>> One thing that might help is to warn if --anchor is used without
>> --patience, but I couldn't find a good place to put that warning. Let me
>> know if you know of a good place.
>
> How about dropping --anchor option and do it as "--patience=<pattern>"?
Well, that may not be an optimal suggestion, as it is always a pain
to have to deal with an option with optional argument.
I understand that the case you would really want to warn against is
git diff --histogram --anchor=foo
and not
git diff --anchor=foo
as it is sensible to turn --patience on implicitly. Perhaps a good
starting point might be to rename the option to include "patience"
somewhere in its name ("--patience-anchor=<pattern>"?) to make it
more obvious that it is about helping the patience algorithm. And
then make "--patience-anchor=<pattern>" without any other algorithm
selection option to behave as if "--patience" was also given.
What do we do when
git diff --histogram --patience
is given? Do we warn? If we don't, perhaps it may not be too bad
if
git diff --histogram --patience-anchor=foo
git diff --patience-anchor=foo --histogram
did not get any warning. Instead we just implicitly turn any
occurence of --patience-anchor=foo into --patience followed by the
same option, and assume that the user wanted the usual "last one
wins" semantics. It would turn patience on for the former, and
ignore the anchor for the latter and use historgram.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 22:17 [RFC PATCH] xdiff/xpatience: support anchoring a line Jonathan Tan
2017-11-21 23:28 ` Stefan Beller
2017-11-22 2:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-22 23:41 ` [PATCH] xdiff/xpatience: support anchoring line(s) Jonathan Tan
2017-11-23 0:15 ` Stefan Beller
2017-11-23 2:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-23 2:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-11-23 2:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-27 18:30 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-11-27 19:47 ` [PATCH v2] diff: " Jonathan Tan
2017-11-28 1:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-28 18:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Jonathan Tan
2017-11-30 0:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-30 23:26 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-12-04 19:45 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq3755sprp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.