From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2641F858 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757479AbcG1Tw4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:56 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65086 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757309AbcG1Tww (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:52 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA9C2F07B; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5E/vz1xABtoBZ03Ru7CfObNjT/c=; b=uG61Ch OWI0a+6HX1oulW7UDAGsR4Xpb4KMPUikHknQDm/AfKUoiZSVcroV0iWFab0jsR4c e5x9IA9Q7se21x970iAsDhJHucA8gjeFyM1zg+kMF9CkdIZq2pZ2EwlPZtCTaipH UZXeudzG/c7wqke8p/HOFXYrDoXk0JVrgFjr4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ox0wbu3mZ/tm0O7gXkLyL3hj9z07C9gM MCr1AAOEXAeIXZ48CuRNCiiJQsDz3HZeKycZtxi+2l+eHfq+HyVEmPcbKOk2ib17 oJSHizrpalUgMc4mgc0vgiN0TZ4xFDjtlUFh1csEtMrQ9RqcEsvCELuRUytde/Qz gkrif9cTLVg= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3609C2F07A; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABBD82F078; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jens Lehmann , Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t7406: correct depth test in shallow test References: <20160728172641.8376-1-sbeller@google.com> <20160728172641.8376-2-sbeller@google.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:52:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:24:03 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DD911358-54FC-11E6-9633-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > The depth of 2 I chose originally turns out to be a lucky > accident too, as the depth from "Commit 2" is 2, > so that we would observe the same depth no matter if > a --depth 2 was given and working or not. > > I'll redo this test (as 2 tests, one is testing the situation as > we have now, i.e. the desired tip is reachable from within > the depth argument, the second test will test if it is not > reachable.) Good that I was puzzled ;-) Looking forward to see an improved test. Thanks.