Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #02; Mon, 7)

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>>
>> >> * tb/midx-avoid-cruft-packs (2025-06-23) 9 commits
>> >>  - repack: exclude cruft pack(s) from the MIDX where possible
>> >>  - pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow'
>> >>  - pack-objects: swap 'show_{object,commit}_pack_hint'
>> >>  - pack-objects: fix typo in 'show_object_pack_hint()'
>> >>  - pack-objects: perform name-hash traversal for unpacked objects
>> >>  - pack-objects: declare 'rev_info' for '--stdin-packs' earlier
>> >>  - pack-objects: factor out handling '--stdin-packs'
>> >>  - pack-objects: limit scope in 'add_object_entry_from_pack()'
>> >>  - pack-objects: use standard option incompatibility functions
>> >>
>> >>  "pack-objects" has been taught to avoid pointing into objects in
>> >>  cruft packs from midx.
>> >>
>> >>  Will merge to 'next'?
>> >>  source: <cover.1750717921.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
>> >
>> > I think that this one is ready to go. Since Elijah and Peff last
>> > reviewed it, it hasn't changed substantially (other than a few
>> > bugfix-related changes that were discovered while rolling this out at
>> > GitHub).
>> >
>> > The series has been running on GitHub's production infrastructure for
>> > the last month or two without issue, so I think this is good from a
>> > stability perspective.
>> >
>> > I've CC'd Elijah and Peff here, since they were the last two to review
>> > the series, but I don't think that they have any objections to this
>> > moving along.
>>
>> OK.  As they both seem to be active, let me wait for a bit and then
>> mark it for 'next' unless we hear anything unexpected.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Yep, I think this version is good to merge to next; thanks.

Thanks.