From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Cc: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>,
"Git Development" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t: run tests from a normalized working directory
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 11:22:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4iwwk7mc.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08b9b990-9ddc-740e-99ab-82d09fb30ef3@chromium.org> (Mark Mentovai's message of "Tue, 3 Jun 2025 09:15:54 -0400 (EDT)")
Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org> writes:
> Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Yes. You need to specify what you are canonicalizing to, and once
>>> you are going to do so, there is no need for that heavy verb, i.e.
>>> you do not need to say "canonicalize it to realpath"---you say "turn
>>> it into realpath" and you convey what you want to say just fine.
>>>
>> Re-reading the help for realpath() and pwd, would this makes sense:
>> t: run tests from an absolute pathname
> ...
> Making a path absolute is a different transformation than what is at
> issue here. You may have been misled by the fact that pwd -P and
> realpath both make paths absolute in addition to performing symbolic
> link resolution. The latter is what's operative here.
>
> As I've explained, the paths in question are already absolute in git's
> test suite today, even without the proposed change. It's not correct
> to summarize the change as making paths absolute, when that's neither
> changing nor the crux of the problem.
Absolutely ;-)
"normalized" does invite "normalize to what standard" question, but
as you mentioned in an earlier post, "realpath" is a bit dense for
those who don't read realpath(3) manual pages, and "symlink-resolved
file path" is quite mouthful even though it might be understandable.
Let me merge it down with the commit title as-is and then cook it in
'next' during the -rc period.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-03 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 19:37 [PATCH] t7900: use pwd -P in macOS maintenance test Mark Mentovai
2025-05-23 20:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-23 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23 21:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-23 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-24 4:39 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-05-27 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23 20:43 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-05-23 21:36 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v2] t: run tests from a normalized working directory Mark Mentovai
2025-05-28 23:08 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-05-30 5:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-31 5:46 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-06-01 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-02 16:08 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-06-02 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 5:02 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-06-03 13:15 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-06-03 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq4iwwk7mc.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@chromium.org \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.