From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2242A46551 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 17:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708363176; cv=none; b=C3LV59InVc85VaX3ZzUsqtYAgan2djoRshg27HMaJOjNUBzNuRkHO25BqVlVQ21I60pxihUqUcDWjcHaD49UaMYJMJ/RfKJ0dstKc9n7r9wZ49Zla0magvPqTfvOtb2jzpkcxdBsaBW6cDGg2eOJJnhicsyMeLJ/qQwCDfJSSG0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708363176; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jAjGMK07G4euA7Zi/aBBLvTtxcwb4ZOoaDp2B63xQHA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dgzqQVLFXcusuymZseGBrEe8+Lb/N68bhvGfH57eZzwwNa381JXVikOBIcJSk46t6SbUDGtqsHXNpnewC+q3MN0Nwb52oS/Sbxbp37VC5Idr3Bip9sOT5+6x3wIUN11yc+xibP5cOdquHYaah2FvADnmFYaYaJA6WdryfPaHlHU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=KcPAbooN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="KcPAbooN" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82D11D0E02; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:19:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=jAjGMK07G4euA7Zi/aBBLvTtxcwb4ZOoaDp2B6 3xQHA=; b=KcPAbooNNakEmOmyiIJ+QdBEEh/FQcpMdSx9HkI+FmrZMtRZAQ9Tfn Wklvq/jDvd+Zid042QCZ9tQ80PDPKITcD4VpilKMD/Irw4fYqWIhECnYvzDbbfGf 7oFpQ+O4kjuva4Z4ALBTKlCmZ1KxGkr/JLJQN+Lrmsn+RyXLvDJ0g= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF7A1D0E01; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:19:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.165.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C2901D0E00; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:19:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Beat Bolli , git@vger.kernel.org, Philippe Blain , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: use awk for filtering the config entries In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 18 Feb 2024 22:58:20 +0100 (CET)") References: <20240216171046.927552-1-dev+git@drbeat.li> <4a1d3618-cebe-4c20-89ce-c5dab51af21a@drbeat.li> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:19:26 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 08DD7666-CF4B-11EE-9E3F-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Johannes Schindelin writes: >> > Makes sense. I wonder if we can have some simple script sanity >> > checker that catches things like this, e.g., catting a single file >> > into pipe, grep appearing upstream of awk or sed, etc. >> >> Yes, there are quite a few cases of these in t/. I'm not sure if it's worth >> the churn, though. At least it would make the tests faster on Windows... > > Thank you for caring about the speed on Windows! Yup, that is why I asked ;-)