All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] completion: complete REVERT_HEAD and BISECT_HEAD
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:25:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4jpiqki4.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3a47758f9dce20c29ffb776bffaf73e238c20d1.1681495119.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:58:35 +0000")

"Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
>
> The pseudorefs REVERT_HEAD and BISECT_HEAD are not suggested
> by the __git_refs function. Add them there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
> ---
>  contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> index dc95c34cc85..bcda376735c 100644
> --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ __git_refs ()
>  			track=""
>  			;;
>  		*)
> -			for i in HEAD FETCH_HEAD ORIG_HEAD MERGE_HEAD REBASE_HEAD CHERRY_PICK_HEAD; do
> +			for i in HEAD FETCH_HEAD ORIG_HEAD MERGE_HEAD REBASE_HEAD CHERRY_PICK_HEAD REVERT_HEAD BISECT_HEAD; do
>  				case "$i" in
>  				$match*|$umatch*)
>  					if [ -e "$dir/$i" ]; then

This does obvious change to add two completion possibilities reusing
exactly the same logic we have been using.

A tangent related to my earlier "didn't we plan to limit them to
*_HEAD at some point?" is that we could turn the loop around and do
something like

		for i in HEAD $(cd "$dir" && echo *_HEAD)
		do
			case "$i" in
			$match*|$umatch*)
				if test -f "$dir/$i"
				then
					...

which could be a lot more future-proof, once we have such a rule.

But that is a tangent that we should wait until the current series
settles.

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-14 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14 17:58 [PATCH 0/5] Document 'AUTO_MERGE' and more special refs Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-04-14 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] revisions.txt: document " Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-04-14 18:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-15  5:18     ` Felipe Contreras
2023-04-14 19:49   ` Victoria Dye
2023-04-14 21:14     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-15  5:35       ` Felipe Contreras
2023-04-14 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] completion: complete REVERT_HEAD and BISECT_HEAD Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-04-14 20:25   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-04-14 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] git-merge.txt: modernize word choice in "True merge" section Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-04-14 20:36   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-14 17:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] Documentation: document AUTO_MERGE Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-04-14 21:41   ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-15  5:08   ` Eric Sunshine
2023-04-15  7:08     ` Elijah Newren
2023-04-15  8:55       ` Eric Sunshine
2023-04-16  3:05         ` Elijah Newren
2023-04-15  7:03   ` Elijah Newren
2023-04-15 15:36     ` Philippe Blain
2023-04-15 23:31       ` Elijah Newren
2023-04-14 17:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] completion: complete AUTO_MERGE Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-04-14 18:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] Document 'AUTO_MERGE' and more special refs Junio C Hamano
2023-04-14 19:49 ` Victoria Dye
2023-04-15  7:09 ` Elijah Newren
2023-04-16 10:26   ` Chris Torek
2023-05-22 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-05-22 19:28   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] revisions.txt: use description list for " Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-05-22 19:28   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] revisions.txt: document more " Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-05-22 19:28   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] completion: complete REVERT_HEAD and BISECT_HEAD Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-05-22 19:28   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] git-merge.txt: modernize word choice in "True merge" section Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-05-22 19:29   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Documentation: document AUTO_MERGE Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-05-22 19:29   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] completion: complete AUTO_MERGE Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget
2023-06-01  6:18   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Document 'AUTO_MERGE' and more special refs Elijah Newren
2023-06-01  7:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-06-01  7:30   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq4jpiqki4.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.