From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, sunshine@sunshineco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] sha1_file.c: support reading from a loose object of unknown type
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:10:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4moepijp.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150417205125.GA7067@peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:51:26 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:21:31AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>>
>> > If there _is_ a performance implication to worry about here, I think it
>> > would be that we are doing an extra malloc/free.
>>
>> Thanks for reminding me; yes, that also worried me.
>
> As an aside, I worried about the extra allocation for reading the header
> in the first place. But it looks like we only do this on the --literally
> code path (and otherwise use the normal unpack_sha1_header). Still, I
> wonder if we could make this work automagically. That is, speculatively
> unpack the first N bytes, assuming we hit the end-of-header. If not,
> then go to a strbuf as the slow path. Then it would be fine to cover all
> cases; the normal ones would be fast, and only ridiculous things would
> incur the extra allocation.
Yes, that was what I was hoping to see eventually ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 16:55 [PATCH v8 0/4] cat-file: teach cat-file a '--literally' option karthik nayak
2015-04-15 16:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] sha1_file.c: support reading from a loose object of unknown type Karthik Nayak
2015-04-15 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-15 22:18 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 14:23 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 16:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-17 20:51 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 21:10 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-04-20 18:43 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-20 18:51 ` Jeff King
2015-04-21 11:26 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-21 14:24 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 18:45 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-17 18:49 ` Jeff King
2015-04-18 8:31 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-17 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-18 8:32 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-17 23:31 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-18 9:03 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-15 16:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] cat-file: teach cat-file a '--literally' option Karthik Nayak
2015-04-15 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-15 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-16 7:26 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-16 13:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-17 2:10 ` Karthik Nayak
2015-04-17 2:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-19 0:28 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-20 5:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-20 7:44 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-20 8:57 ` Karthik Nayak
2015-04-20 9:19 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-20 15:52 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-21 10:16 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-21 19:40 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-21 20:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-25 11:22 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-25 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-27 11:57 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-27 18:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-28 12:03 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] cat-file: add documentation for " Karthik Nayak
2015-04-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] t1006: add tests for git cat-file --literally Karthik Nayak
2015-04-18 0:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-18 5:22 ` karthik nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq4moepijp.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.