From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Junio C Hamano <gister@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:42:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4n5fcym7.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=vXGiHbd__ZNfp42fRS_gK5MNmYx13=uzDfc0m==V5Fw@mail.gmail.com> (Ramkumar Ramachandra's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:10:45 +0530")
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I do not mind allowing laziness by defaulting to something, but I am
>> not enthused by an approach that adds the new variable whose value
>> is questionable. The description does not justify at all why
>> @{upstream} is not a good default (unless the workflow is screwed up
>> and @{upstream} is set to point at somewhere that is _not_ a true
>> upstream, that is).
>
> Did you find the explanation I gave in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/240077
> reasonable?
No.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 20:29 [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:30 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:40 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 21:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:16 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:35 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08 9:33 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling Jeff King
2014-01-08 12:37 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] branch_get: return early on error Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:27 ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:47 ` [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups Jeff King
2014-01-10 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-11 4:22 ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 11:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] implement @{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 18:20 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 8:39 ` Philip Oakley
2014-01-09 22:03 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 0:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 21:35 ` Jeff King
2014-01-24 22:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-24 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-15 11:50 ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-18 8:52 ` Jeff King
2014-02-18 13:10 ` Johan Herland
2014-02-18 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-08 12:40 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:36 ` [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 20:40 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq4n5fcym7.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=gister@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.