From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Cc: Michael Darling <darlingm@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Not a BUG: For first push to a bare repo, using "--tags" prevents creation of master branch
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:48:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq6175zn70.fsf_-_@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpqoal3p8wo.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (Matthieu Moy's message of "Fri, 29 May 2015 19:53:43 +0200")
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> I recall "fetch --tags" was updated to become your "--tags-also" by
>> e66ef7ae (Merge branch 'mh/fetch-tags-in-addition-to-normal-refs',
>> 2013-12-12). Perhaps we should do the same on the push side.
>
> Would we still have a way to push tags only with this?
>
> fetch and push are a bit different: it's almost never a bad idea to run
> fetch (I see remote-tracking as a kind of cache, and fetch is the way to
> refresh this cache), but pushing too much can be harmful. Not a strong
> objection, but I'm not sure that this change is 100% safe for everyone.
Whether the user is familiar with "git fetch --tags" or not, "git
push --tags" that is not spelled as "git push 'tags/*'" does look
like an option that augments what the command normally does, and the
"mistaken" (non-)bug report was very understandable.
After having thought about this, I would say that it would not add
much value to the system if we add it as "git push --tags-also". We
should either keep the current semantics as-is, or we replace "git
push --tags" to make it similar to what "git fetch --tags" does, I
think.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-29 0:10 BUG: For first push to a bare repo, using "--tags" prevents creation of master branch Michael Darling
2015-05-29 5:35 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-05-29 15:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-29 15:45 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-05-29 16:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-29 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-29 17:53 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-05-29 18:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq6175zn70.fsf_-_@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=darlingm@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.