From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: option value may be separate for valid reasons
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:49:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7c8r7wab.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTCiyc-8GnEEKZvDTAvmrXNrfJ-Uq4=7TCv21UgoiKAZw@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:35:59 -0500")
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 10:14 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Even though `git help cli` recommends users to prefer using
>> "--option=value" over "--option value", there can be reasons why
>> giving them separately is a good idea. One reason is that shells do
>> not perform tilde expansion for `--option=~/path/name` but they
>> expand `--options ~/path/name` just fine.
>>
>> This is not a problem for many options whose option parsing is
>> properly written using OPT_FILENAME(), because the value given to
>> OPT_FILENAME() is tilde-expanded internally by us, but some commands
>> take a pathname as a mere string, which needs this trick to have the
>> shell help us.
>>
>> I think the reason we originally decided to recommend the stuck form
>> was because an option that takes an optional value requires you to
>> use it in the stuck form, and it is one less thing for users to
>> worry about if they get into the habit to always use the stuck form.
>> But we should be discouraging ourselves from adding an option with
>> an optional value in the first place, and we might want to weaken
>> the current recommendation.
>>
>> In any case, let's describe this one case where it is necessary to
>> use the separate form, with an example.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>
> v2 looks good to me.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-24 9:43 [PATCH] doc: option value may be separate for valid reasons Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 23:54 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-11-25 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2024-11-25 3:35 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-11-25 4:49 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq7c8r7wab.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.