From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Nathan Neulinger <nneul@neulinger.org>,
Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: git status always modifies index?
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 16:37:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7eu4mysc.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171127205731.GB27469@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:57:31 -0800")
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> I am worried that the project is not learning from what happened here.
> ...
> Fair enough, though that feels like overengineering. But I *still*
> don't see what that has to do with the name "no-optional-locks". When
> is a lock *optional*? And how am I supposed to discover this option?
>
> This also came up during review, and I am worried that this review
> feedback is being ignored. In other words, I have no reason to
> believe it won't happen again.
I too would like to see this part explained a bit better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-03 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 15:19 git status always modifies index? Nathan Neulinger
2017-11-22 15:30 ` Santiago Torres
2017-11-22 15:37 ` Nathan Neulinger
2017-11-22 16:10 ` Santiago Torres
2017-11-22 16:20 ` Nathan Neulinger
2017-11-22 16:24 ` Santiago Torres
2017-11-22 20:27 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-11-22 21:17 ` Jeff King
2017-11-22 21:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-11-22 22:06 ` Jeff King
2017-11-25 21:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-26 19:25 ` Jeff King
2017-11-26 21:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-27 5:24 ` Jeff King
2017-11-27 6:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-27 20:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-27 6:04 ` [PATCH] git-status.txt: mention --no-optional-locks Jeff King
2017-11-27 6:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-27 10:22 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-27 20:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-27 20:44 ` git status always modifies index? Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-27 20:49 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-11-26 3:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-26 9:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-27 4:43 ` Jeff King
2017-11-27 4:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-27 5:00 ` Jeff King
2017-11-27 20:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-11-27 22:50 ` Jeff King
2017-12-03 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-11-26 19:27 ` Jeff King
2017-11-27 0:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-27 6:12 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq7eu4mysc.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=nneul@neulinger.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=santiago@nyu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.