From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58B8202A0 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932205AbdJXAyf (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:54:35 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50673 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932170AbdJXAya (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:54:30 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C338495145; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:54:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=sDcH4ELeJMVR/lOmQo1FWnAINTs=; b=v6dyLp XlcrhxqSPNxucYhCVRGVeo3Gz4tDfUgs58QkSAXeLW6xul6mIzltx9/A2w0sb3FM iKwfk3I/pGZgRqhQbFCevir0HKWEZhYtCkHK2wg/FHpUj9otDvRusu9ogSS0Uc1B vS+V0oU+lpvzjnogdl361h11lrVf6HvMlwuKE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SBQtiPNJqnQMk7WjjSk/T2FI0ymyKHEk kj2BtZzFKmg44sQXOu62GI2Db9wxtl/8DboEMqe25P/TLkpMzH3UxKQUuieCpq10 zSiCSg0GG9H2DOGF3z8r90rIf5Lw7tqUopmhIUwao0qBp9njiZk4F1xs/ADsOct9 JioheYUPosc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC6D95144; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EEC895142; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:54:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Heiko Voigt Cc: Stefan Beller , Jens.Lehmann@web.de, bmwill@google.com, git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fetch, push: keep separate lists of submodules and gitlinks References: <20171019181109.27792-1-sbeller@google.com> <20171019181109.27792-2-sbeller@google.com> <20171023141259.GB85043@book.hvoigt.net> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:54:27 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20171023141259.GB85043@book.hvoigt.net> (Heiko Voigt's message of "Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:12:59 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E3C910C8-B855-11E7-8E5D-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Heiko Voigt writes: > Why sorry? For me it is actually interesting to see you basically coming > to the same conclusions. I find it also assuring to see that two people not constantly working together closely come to the same conclusion. Thanks.