From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23DF20196 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751729AbcGNUeI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:34:08 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58416 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751315AbcGNUeG (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:34:06 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31902AB2C; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:34:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XiSwJZQqW5L2w8+ePbbvOVwDQto=; b=WpYhx9 /ZJj1h0IcnYpnz36LZI+SDrrR8GuE4oaTvXCDNwjyAGSOjihzkS7YnuE//W4deYV KoFTU1QyfrcwOxqgUp5XAK24Vf503dFkazR9FmCcNTTfquK59ET/ykljECqFyAe3 32aFD8JqMhvAe2dhqVFVeJKRJmQBW2c5AKY1A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VKpG6SoyxMmBHDUi9T8hVuMraDZYZsUo YJLxrQ0UyPyGV7IjFXzKymaOeVV/bQsjnKDHH3ssPENRXWYZUaurepWU1n4b/r/C EkvWuchXzHD/eO8R63LxU8GR1gwC0RTVhHjPno/3bPP+lD5sJi+ONFoiTcBhRpsY AAQqUl3l598= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA89B2AB29; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:34:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E5582AB28; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:34:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers References: <20160630090614.GA16725@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160630090857.GB17463@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714182108.GB16497@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714201018.GA18372@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714202727.GA19101@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:34:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160714202727.GA19101@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:27:27 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4E40B014-4A02-11E6-9726-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Yeah, that is what I was trying to get at, but you stated it much more > clearly. LONG_IS_64BIT is good. I wonder if the "git version > --build-options" should be "sizeof-long", too. It's shorter, and > indicates our assumption that we are talking about all longs, not just > unsigned ones. OK, I'll do a final reroll and then wait for Europeans ;-)