From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Detect endianness on more platforms that don't use BYTE_ORDER Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 12:34:33 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20140502074917.GA25198@hashpling.org> <1399017329-25645-1-git-send-email-cbailey32@bloomberg.net> <20140502165830.GA29339@hashpling.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Charles Bailey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 02 21:34:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WgJEI-0006gg-8j for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 21:34:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751975AbaEBTei (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2014 15:34:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:60295 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751824AbaEBTei (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2014 15:34:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBE6124D0; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gU/QifU55yiallC4GCvDCC1aMTI=; b=eAHfGV aA0Voy17A8nXzhRHtFJFXvnRIA/mowOeCZDsQ8WXmG47HfW2ZCSoct1owUGzZo+A a8jsx/e23BTYwAKdBd9uFSPZ8sYlzhULNMOaRtW/RDPfjxTqFWHcYjHsf290rruQ MU3D3QELug0XTnjDhovWNQ0OOI1m1J3bylMLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YmHHVTYLE8VYM9co3TqtZgf2goQ9yRUs ZU6X6fTwm7wFKzK9x6EX0q7aQuwOGPhKKMD3Te4XB/nA0cH2ah+68yPwvH26fTH5 DTHCHMX92P9R4n6mnWJP46E7Q2VPWy7I7GAjREb5KytF/CTsQklK6C5+n7WhNsQt uSknI5ncrBQ= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D32124CF; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DB97124C4; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:34:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20140502165830.GA29339@hashpling.org> (Charles Bailey's message of "Fri, 2 May 2014 17:58:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CA9B29CE-D230-11E3-9353-9CEB01674E00-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Charles Bailey writes: > I claim that any > platform which provides both but with differing senses is somewhat > broken so I cannot see the precedence mattering much. I agree with that, and that is the reason why we shouldn't change the order all of a sudden. If it shouldn't matter, then there is only downside of a possiblity to break such an insane set-up that has been happily working by accident, without helping anybody if we change it, no?