All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
	Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] ls-remote: inconsistency from the order of args and opts
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:19:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8rvh6biw.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <220115.86czktrelu.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> ("Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason"'s message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2022 02:02:15 +0100")

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> Hence suggesting that the user just add "--" to resolve the ambiguity,
> as gitcli already discusses.

Sadly, requiring "--end-of-options" is a solution for a problem that
we didn't have to create.  If we didn't take options written after
arg,

    git rm --end-of-options foo -r
    git rm foo ./-r

to force "-r" to be interpreted as a filename wouldn't have been
necessary.  The presence of "foo" before "-r" would have been
sufficient.

I agree with you that, unfortunately, we'd need to teach a way (i.e.
"--" or "--end-of-options") to defeat this misguided GNUism in some
commands.  Even if users stick to "options and then args", sadly,
they need to know it.

But we do already explain "--" and "--end-of-options" in gitcli.txt
so we should be OK.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-15  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14  4:24 [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] ls-remote: inconsistency from the order of args and opts Teng Long
2022-01-14  4:24 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] ls-remote: Make the output independent of the order of opts and <remote> Teng Long
2022-01-14  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] ls-remote: inconsistency from the order of args and opts Junio C Hamano
2022-01-14  6:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-14  6:42   ` Teng Long
2022-01-15  0:25     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-14 19:57   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-14 20:42     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-14 20:57       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-14 21:52         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-15  0:34           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-15  1:01             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-14 21:12     ` brian m. carlson
2022-01-15  0:13       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-15  0:50         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-15  1:02           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-15  1:19             ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-01-17  6:27 ` Teng Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq8rvh6biw.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=dyroneteng@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    --cc=tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.