From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Get rid of the non portable shell export VAR=VALUE costruct Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:25:03 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1400840131-966-1-git-send-email-gitter.spiros@gmail.com> <20140523184405.GE12314@google.com> <537FB249.8050708@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Elia Pinto , git@vger.kernel.org, dak@gnu.org To: Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 23 23:25:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnwxp-0000OA-Dz for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 23:25:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751249AbaEWVZK convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 17:25:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:62053 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039AbaEWVZJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 17:25:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A31B978; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:25:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=BXOyJam1CFqB qaEQovuXbBY5gbA=; b=H67+Og/Sm8WGNBYVdYvnKznbOyaIC80WNbgkEKfQ5Ef7 XKylptEQWXFUix9t79wBLw6IZut9SVVCfKcZj6g0bXo1G5tZN8LI8D+awYj9H2ju 21jQ3WYjdTQPzFgGGQLvCZQzdoPrFaLSkqfRMUNoex+hqmc6uxcQsbdbFrzu/qI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EuzafW qXOJAyVTwS0E6AB6XXY3znGFJ4VWx2NA3yRUiQnlNbL9KYs5CZ5XIiz/yC5SSBxg aKSTtKZLf7UI9HukNLFiEDpBUVjFxb4r4pbCa6KN9PTq2AG670C23UvozcArYLEi A8H6jvcH3iFqxdtmbJvCgm2ut1oVnKYNQbz5U= Received: from pb-smtp0. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18F11B977; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:25:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4628D1B974; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:25:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <537FB249.8050708@web.de> ("Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershaus?= =?utf-8?Q?en=22's?= message of "Fri, 23 May 2014 22:40:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B534D008-E2C0-11E3-B16C-9903E9FBB39C-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Torsten B=C3=B6gershausen writes: > I wonder if we could keep the anchoring (to reduce false positives) > and try to catch a line "command1 && command2" at the same time: Well, "command1 || command2" would be the next thing you want to catch, and I think you are at the entrance of a slipperly slope at that point.