From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, David Bimmler <david.bimmler@isovalent.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sequencer: start removing private fields from public API
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:42:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa5lqs8r7.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2beedb4547013629a507d646d582ca6b3f420c2c.1713445918.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> (Phillip Wood's message of "Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:14:06 +0100")
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> +/*
> + * A 'struct replay_ctx' represents the private state of the sequencer.
> + */
> +struct replay_ctx {
> + /*
> + * Stores the reflog message that will be used when creating a
> + * commit. Points to a static buffer and should not be free()'d.
> + */
> + const char *reflog_message;
> +};
> +
> +struct replay_ctx* replay_ctx_new(void)
Style.
Also if you intend to make the structure opaque and private,
shouldn't you make this static to make it truly internal? The
initializer of the containing replay_opts structure would be the
only thing that needs to know how to instantiate it, no? Or does a
replay_ctx has reason to exist outside the context of an instance of
replay_opts?
i.e.
static struct replay_ctx *replay_ctx_new(void)
The remainder seem mechanical so I'll skip them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 13:14 [PATCH 0/5] rebase -m: fix --signoff with conflicts Phillip Wood
2024-04-18 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] sequencer: always free "struct replay_opts" Phillip Wood
2024-04-18 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] sequencer: start removing private fields from public API Phillip Wood
2024-04-18 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-04-18 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] sequencer: move current fixups to private context Phillip Wood
2024-04-18 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-18 13:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] sequencer: store commit message in " Phillip Wood
2024-04-18 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-18 13:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] rebase -m: fix --signoff with conflicts Phillip Wood
2024-04-18 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa5lqs8r7.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=david.bimmler@isovalent.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.