From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Subject: Re: unifying sequencer's options persisting, was Re: [PATCH v2] sequencer: fix edit handling for cherry-pick and revert messages
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:01:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa6qg4d0i.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b117e65-bf9f-af13-b093-28bbbd6f9bb3@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:28:43 +0100")
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> I think we would save a lot by only syncing the state to disk when we
> stop or run an exec command (the state needs to be synced so exec
> commands can alter the todo list). In those cases we need to write the
> index and possibly run an external process so writing a couple of
> files is probably insignificant.
The optimization opportunity of this may be a lot smaller than you
would think---you must cater to not just exec but hook scripts that
are run while a new commit is made, which means every step you'd
need to write anyway.
> Where I think we can usefully consolidate is the one-line files which
> store the options rather than state - these are read an written much
> less frequently so I don't think they have much of a performance hit
> but it would be much nicer to just serialize the options to a single
> file.
Would that break external scripts, hooks, etc.? I am not sure if we
even have any rough consensus for allowing other people to peek into
the .git/rebase-*/ directories, but I am inclined to say that it
sounds more like a solution looking for a problem than a good idea
to solve some concrete problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-02 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 7:16 [PATCH] sequencer: fix edit handling for cherry-pick and revert messages Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-03-26 12:27 ` Philip Oakley
2021-03-26 15:12 ` Elijah Newren
2021-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-29 9:23 ` Phillip Wood
2021-03-29 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-29 21:25 ` Elijah Newren
2021-03-30 2:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-03-30 10:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-30 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-30 20:16 ` Elijah Newren
2021-03-31 17:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-31 17:52 ` Elijah Newren
2021-03-31 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-01 16:31 ` Elijah Newren
2021-03-30 19:37 ` Elijah Newren
2021-03-31 13:48 ` unifying sequencer's options persisting, was " Johannes Schindelin
2021-04-02 11:28 ` Phillip Wood
2021-04-02 13:10 ` Phillip Wood
2021-04-02 21:01 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-04-02 22:18 ` Elijah Newren
2021-04-02 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-08 2:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-04-08 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-08 19:58 ` Christian Couder
2021-04-09 13:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-31 6:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-03-31 14:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-02 11:40 unifying sequencer's options persisting, was Re: [PATCH v2] " Gabriel Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa6qg4d0i.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.email \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.