From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E2620229 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755338AbcJUWON (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:14:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52001 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754732AbcJUWON (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:14:13 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661CD48297; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:14:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4ihrVgjsoySzug1VwUsfucO6nWI=; b=UMzitr /MPUONOWtZOtHIm/9CwUMtT6m5zMcH58wILDHv0qEuQYclH5rN8QYMUeHWj+xxxp CP4Vekl2DC5pYLtJzZgapwVcQKwJ2u5BpjUau9yJB1LJyGJHVp2C1lxQKZfm2lne 7sHt6kh7rLBXZuXA13lxyhH04Kl50VX0jRxoU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mVUfzUeRZ85j+cbyVpTHEJZSZi5Ax6Ea Wc/VOi/X4jKlpHIBEYehQ0b3CQyL3zQvCYkkyfyESv4wS4gcHd8L0/juUEPeQ4pT fD7hig1uA2CPmovzlLDVkUutGwx1v4KlgMR6YtbXHMs5zZv05A1CD3plphSFO6DH fmZpkmrQ0y4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBE748296; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:14:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E472C48295; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:14:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Duy Nguyen , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [BUG] fetch output is ugly in 'next' References: <20161021002654.qo6kcya4gocp73rs@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161021214218.u46qf3lch3wwiutp@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:14:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161021214218.u46qf3lch3wwiutp@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:42:18 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B14AF878-97DB-11E6-8992-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > The "right" fix is to queue up the list of ref updates to print, find > the abbreviations for each, and then print them all in one shot, knowing > ahead of time the size necessary to align them. This could also let us > improve the name-alignment. Heh, that was what I was starting to code while listening to Jonathan and Stefan talk in a meeting ;-)