All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reset sometimes updates mtime
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:56:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa8v5w6xi.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436450534.15519.49.camel@kaarsemaker.net> (Dennis Kaarsemaker's message of "Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:02:14 +0200")

Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> writes:

> I'm seeing some behaviour with git reset that I find odd. Basically if I
> do
>
> git fetch && \
> git reset --hard simple-tag-that-points-to-the-current-commit
>
> sometimes the reset will update the mtime of all files and directories
> in the repo and sometimes it will leave them alone. Changing it to
>
> git fetch && \
> git status && \
> git reset --hard simple-tag-that-points-to-the-current-commit
>
> Cause the mtime update to reliably not happen.

If my theory on what is happening is correct, I do not think there
is any bug in what "reset --hard" is doing.

My theory is that something is causing the stat info that is cached
in your index and the lstat(2) return you get from your working tree
files go out of sync.  Even though you are not actively touching any
working tree files (otherwise, you wouldn't be complaining about
mtime changing in the first place), perhaps your build of Git
records timestamps in NS but your filesystem and the operating
system does not preserve nanosecond resolution of timestamps when it
evicts inode data from the core, or something like that?  If that is
what is happening, I think that "fetch" is a red herring, but any
operation that takes some time and/or hits filesystem reasonably
hard would trigger it.

And the reason why I say there is no bug in what "reset --hard" is
doing here, if the above theory is correct, is because:

 - The user asked "reset --hard" to "make sure that my working tree
   files are identical to those of HEAD";

 - "reset --hard" looks at lstat(2) return and the cached stat info
   in the index and find them not to match.  It can do one of two
   things:

   (1) see if the user did something stupid, like "touch file", that
       modifies only lstat(2) info without actually changing its
       contents, by reading from the working tree, reading HEAD:file
       from the object database, and comparing them, and overwrite
       the working tree file only when they do not match.

       or

   (2) the contents might happen to be the same, but the end result
       user desires to have is that the contents of the working tree
       file is the same as that from the HEAD, so overwrite it
       without wasting time reading two and compare before doing so.

   and it is perfectly reasonable to do the latter.  After all, the
   whole point of having its cached lstat(2) data in the index is to
   so that we do not have to always compare the contents before
   deciding something has changed in the working tree.

Running "git update-index --refresh" immediately before "reset" may
alleviate the issue.  "git status" has the same effect, only because
it does "update-index --refresh" at the beginning of its processing,
but it wastes a lot more time and resource doing other things.

But unless/until you know _why_ the cached stat info in your index
goes stale relative to what lstat(2) tells you, it would not "solve"
it, because that magical thing (and my theory is cached data in your
operating system that keeps a file timestamp with more precision
than your underlying filesystem can represent is being flushed, and
reading the file timestamp back from the disk has to truncate the
nanoseconds part) can happen at any time between the "--refresh" and
your "reset".

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-09 14:02 Reset sometimes updates mtime Dennis Kaarsemaker
2015-07-09 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-07-10  7:30   ` Dennis Kaarsemaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqa8v5w6xi.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dennis@kaarsemaker.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.