From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add revision range support on "-" and "@{-1}" Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:24:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1426518703-15785-1-git-send-email-kenny.lee28@gmail.com> <1426518703-15785-3-git-send-email-kenny.lee28@gmail.com> <87egons4du.fsf@gmail.com> <87r3sfz25t.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Kenny Lee Sin Cheong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 25 23:24:39 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yatj1-0007xz-93 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:24:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751916AbbCYWYb (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:24:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:57093 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbbCYWY3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:24:29 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242C544B20; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:24:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qAZ6pBf/1YICkIq3QddwuqqbEX0=; b=AQ96mN VOoyE2rgTu5vLfkrvjcO8qO4fduzKEGYrLC0/xrOMtxCJjMa7XLSydnQ5J6b/8Ej VaJsqSijPXw61OxGTDuwbNs6i1QG1vMisKf3YK98FN+xTkZfQDN4jF0wjvUuoszB IEbfZXRIxcCJQoAmiPgpZ3uSHcXqxIho4seeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=QqYiipi6wyqv4gUCA0pUQupG8L+gGFGb YZeaFHtOkiUEc+qVm3ZInSBfrwuN3UIfsrah0IdB4FqPJkUpzxETHKsWy1ryOqMa JIca5dqz2qTMVa/4DmVDBln5dNt3uxdcfpB2onynSTh7Dm57u8LHIEEDoKbdTPt5 O/axFgf0Tps= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D78244B1F; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:24:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928A544B1E; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:24:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3sfz25t.fsf@gmail.com> (Kenny Lee Sin Cheong's message of "Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:09:50 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B2EA6D6C-D33D-11E4-BD48-11859F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Kenny Lee Sin Cheong writes: > If I'm understanding correctly, the problem of checking revisions before > arg is that an option fed to handle_revision_arg() might die() before getting > checked as an option in cases where a file with the same name exists? > > But doesn't verify_non_filename() already return silently if arg begins > with "-"? It die() only after making that check. > > If an option with ".." in it such as -$opt..ion is really given to > handle_revision_arg() then verify_non_filename should not be a problem. Yes, but should we be relying on that behaviour? The special casing to assume that no sane person would name a file starting with a dash is what I find somewhat disturbing.