From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] remote-curl: fall back to Basic auth if Negotiate fails Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:36:54 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1420142187-1025433-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <1420676960-492860-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <7930FE25-8206-43A8-9678-C56D789E09CE@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Cc: "brian m. carlson" , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jeff King To: "Dan Langille \(dalangil\)" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 18 00:37:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YNrhN-0003tt-Lb for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:37:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752852AbbBQXg6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:58 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:50368 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752134AbbBQXg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:57 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A121C39D03; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iFYCmSBaF0CiMvsdK2Z5E/v8L88=; b=O9526P y8ax+bErOJJnv1x+NDlKRZKmRRu0Kd6lsJaLOIypPG1HF5CmV4Mj06O35UQEWQcQ 4+GpiaBXgN+gQJDeqcBRVHr4rvQfiYUU8cN3kYHOHgUQJghNcbY8lUdtt+tNDDbH 6DTfPm2i3BtHHy5Kl6k423kjxzMEEo/8LB43Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JRSwJfYtXwNalkkzpF+pC5ckqp9dzRJ0 DJLJJ0D3m+pC2elI4WEqjUPMN8tRu5jQk2dgz3VL5ETeoztSGc7Cl/BG/MSq/Uaw HrffNhcU5NB00PuWyqQAqH0X5LI1B2za4D/WE7B0aVo3Nc3fPNjqaqnGdxSNNuDy 6U/P2MJeuv4= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9754339D02; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D6CA39D01; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dan Langille's message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:05:41 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DBF705AA-B6FD-11E4-9C7E-A4119F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Dan Langille (dalangil)" writes: >> On Jan 20, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> "Dan Langille (dalangil)" writes: >> >>> I did not test this patch. Is that holding up a commit? >> >> I am hoping that you rebuilt the Git you use with this patch by the >> time you wrote the message I am responding to and have been using it >> for your daily Git needs ;-) >> >> I believe it is queued on the 'next' branch so that others like you >> who need the change can verify the improvements, and others unlike >> you who do not need the change can make sure the change does not >> cause unintended consequences. > > Is this the patch in question? > > https://github.com/git/git/commit/4dbe66464b4fd695c5989cc272fa0edd6475037c > > I ask because previous versions of the patch acted against http.h as > well and my failure with it. > > Could I expect that patch work against 2.3.0? > > It applies cleanly, compiles, but cores when I try a ‘git clone’. > Unmatched 2.3.0 succeeds. It already is in 'master', so please holler if things break with that version. Thanks.